These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25003738)

  • 1. The role of packaging size on contamination rates during simulated presentation to a sterile field.
    Trier T; Bello N; Bush TR; Bix L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100414. PubMed ID: 25003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing levels of medical device contamination through package redesign and opening technique.
    Perez P; Bush TR; Hong HG; Pan W; Miller L; Bix L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206892. PubMed ID: 30403724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing AORN recommended practices for selection and use of packaging systems for sterilization.
    Morton PJ; Conner R
    AORN J; 2014 Apr; 99(4):495-502; quiz 502-5. PubMed ID: 24674795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for quantifying key components of the opening process for opening pouch-style packages containing medical devices.
    Vocelle AR; Trier T; Bix L; Bush TR
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Apr; 76():97-104. PubMed ID: 30642530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tests of the microbiologic barrier in sterile packaging].
    Jakimiak B; Röhm-Rodowald E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2002; 53(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12235676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the efficacy of sterile barrier systems against microbial challenges during transport and storage.
    Dunkelberg H; Schmelz U
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19090770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test to determine sterile integrity of wrapped medical products at a probability of recontamination of 1 : 1,000,000.
    Dunkelberg H; Rohmann S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 16622814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines in Practice: Sterilization Packaging Systems.
    Link T
    AORN J; 2020 Sep; 112(3):248-260. PubMed ID: 32857412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary results for a new final package test to assess the quality of sterile package systems.
    Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 25(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 14756215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Aseptic Presentation of Different Medical Device Packaging Configurations.
    Qin S; Li R; Yin Y; Fang L
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2023; 57(3):87-97. PubMed ID: 37624938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Method of Sterile Glove-Opening Influence Back Table Contamination? A Fluorescent Particle Study.
    Holst DC; Angerame MR; Dennis DA; Jennings JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2075-2079. PubMed ID: 31208911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs.
    Butt WE; Bradley DV; Mayhew RB; Schwartz RS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):650-4. PubMed ID: 1812444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions.
    Okamoto K; Rhee Y; Schoeny M; Lolans K; Cheng J; Reddy S; Weinstein RA; Hayden MK; Popovich KJ;
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2019 May; 40(5):559-565. PubMed ID: 30890193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the use of ultrasound affect contamination of musculoskeletal injections sites?
    Sherman T; Ferguson J; Davis W; Russo M; Argintar E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):351-7. PubMed ID: 25163689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A new method of testing the effectiveness of sterile packaging in general practice].
    Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Nov; 47(11):290-3. PubMed ID: 12494550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Looking for Holes in Sterile Wrapping: How Accurate Are We?
    Rashidifard CH; Mayassi HA; Bush CM; Opalacz BM; Richardson MW; Muccino PM; DiPasquale TG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 May; 476(5):1076-1080. PubMed ID: 29432266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays.
    Dalstrom DJ; Venkatarayappa I; Manternach AL; Palcic MS; Heyse BA; Prayson MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1022-5. PubMed ID: 18451394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified gloves: A chance for the prevention of nosocomial infections.
    Gleser M; Schwab F; Solbach P; Vonberg RP
    Am J Infect Control; 2018 Mar; 46(3):266-269. PubMed ID: 28967512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterility of packaged implant components.
    Worthington P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):461. PubMed ID: 15973959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the design of glove dispensing boxes influence glove contamination?
    Assadian O; Leaper DJ; Kramer A; Ousey KJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Nov; 94(3):259-262. PubMed ID: 27773471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.