These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25004473)

  • 1. Using nearest neighbors for accurate estimation of ultrasonic attenuation in the spectral domain.
    Hasan MK; Hussain MA; Ara SR; Lee SY; Alam SK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jun; 60(6):1098-114. PubMed ID: 25004473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct and gradient-based average strain estimation by using weighted nearest neighbor cross-correlation peaks.
    Hussain MA; Abu Anas EM; Alam SK; Lee SY; Hasan MK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Aug; 59(8):1713-28. PubMed ID: 22899118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel power spectrum calculation method using phase-compensation and weighted averaging for the estimation of ultrasound attenuation.
    Heo SW; Kim H
    Ultrasonics; 2010 May; 50(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20083291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 May; 62(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 25965681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients.
    Landry G; Seco J; Gaudreault M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6851-66. PubMed ID: 24025623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Hall TJ; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Jul; 35(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 23858055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum Diffraction-Corrected Frequency-Shift Estimator of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 May; 63(5):691-702. PubMed ID: 26960224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation and dispersion using short time Fourier transform.
    Zhao B; Basir OA; Mittal GS
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Mar; 43(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15737388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic radio-frequency spectrum analysis of normal brain tissue.
    Strowitzki M; Brand S; Jenderka KV
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 17316962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regularized Spectral Log Difference Technique for Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging.
    Coila AL; Lavarello R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Mar; 65(3):378-389. PubMed ID: 28650811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attenuation coefficient estimation using experimental diffraction corrections with multiple interface reflections.
    Lerch TP; Cepel R; Neal SP
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Jan; 44(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16213537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-varying autoregressive spectral estimation for ultrasound attenuation in tissue characterization.
    Girault JM; Ossant F; Ouahabi A; Kouame D; Patat F
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(3):650-9. PubMed ID: 18244216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High resolution ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation based on autoregressive spectral estimation using Burg's algorithm.
    Wear KA; Wagner RF; Garra BS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 18218525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the possibility of non-invasive multilayer temperature estimation using soft-computing methods.
    Teixeira CA; Pereira WC; Ruano AE; Ruano MG
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Jan; 50(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 19695653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.
    Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):533-43. PubMed ID: 22779499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic attenuation estimation in small plaque samples using a power difference method.
    Shi H; Tu H; Dempsey RJ; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Jan; 29(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 17491296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.