196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25004506)
1. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-imaging platform comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements of live rat tumors.
Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Hafez ZT; Nam K; Labyed Y; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Haak A; He Z; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1117-23. PubMed ID: 20587435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.
Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Park Y; Pawlicki AD; Miller RJ; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Aug; 34(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 26206823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1603-1616. PubMed ID: 31031035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative ultrasonic characterization of diffuse scatterers in the presence of structures that produce coherent echoes.
Luchies AC; Ghoshal G; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 May; 59(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 22622974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound.
Nguyen TN; Podkowa AS; Tam AY; Arnold EC; Miller RJ; Park TH; Do MN; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2049-2062. PubMed ID: 31076231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
