These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25005128)

  • 1. Systematic review automation technologies.
    Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Choong MK; Dunn A; Galgani F; Coiera E
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():74. PubMed ID: 25005128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review.
    Jonnalagadda SR; Goyal P; Huffman MD
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():78. PubMed ID: 26073888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study.
    Orel E; Ciglenecki I; Thiabaud A; Temerev A; Calmy A; Keiser O; Merzouki A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e39736. PubMed ID: 37713261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
    Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated gene data integration with Databio.
    Reid RW; Ferrier JW; Jay JJ
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Apr; 13(1):195. PubMed ID: 32238171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort.
    Thomas J; Noel-Storr A; Marshall I; Wallace B; McDonald S; Mavergames C; Glasziou P; Shemilt I; Synnot A; Turner T; Elliott J;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():31-37. PubMed ID: 28912003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Systematic Review Automation Tools on Methodological Quality and Time Taken to Complete Systematic Review Tasks: Case Study.
    Clark J; McFarlane C; Cleo G; Ishikawa Ramos C; Marshall S
    JMIR Med Educ; 2021 May; 7(2):e24418. PubMed ID: 34057072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
    Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
    O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automation of chromatographic peak review and order to result data transfer in a clinical mass spectrometry laboratory.
    Vicente FB; Lin DC; Haymond S
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Nov; 498():84-89. PubMed ID: 31421120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
    Surian D; Dunn AG; Orenstein L; Bashir R; Coiera E; Bourgeois FT
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Mar; 79():32-40. PubMed ID: 29410356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
    van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine.
    Cohen AM; Smalheiser NR; McDonagh MS; Yu C; Adams CE; Davis JM; Yu PS
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 May; 22(3):707-17. PubMed ID: 25656516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system.
    Jardim PSJ; Rose CJ; Ames HM; Echavez JFM; Van de Velde S; Muller AE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35676632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.