141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25006032)
1. A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.
Loux TM; Drake C; Smith-Gagen J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):155-175. PubMed ID: 25006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
Hattori S; Henmi M
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.
Antonelli J; Cefalu M; Palmer N; Agniel D
Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 29750844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust standardization in the relative survival framework.
Syriopoulou E; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6069-6092. PubMed ID: 34523751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators.
Williamson EJ; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter JR
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1617-32. PubMed ID: 22362427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity score weighting with multilevel data.
Li F; Zaslavsky AM; Landrum MB
Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3373-87. PubMed ID: 23526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brief Report: Doubly Robust Estimation of Standardized Risk Difference and Ratio in the Exposed Population.
Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
Epidemiology; 2015 Nov; 26(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 26275176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.
Garès V; Chauvet G; Hajage D
Biom J; 2022 Jan; 64(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 34327720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
