BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25006149)

  • 1. Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research.
    Howie L; Hirsch B; Locklear T; Abernethy AP
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1220-8. PubMed ID: 25006149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainties in real-world decisions on medical technologies.
    Lu CY
    Int J Clin Pract; 2014 Aug; 68(8):936-40. PubMed ID: 25074335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing the leveraging of real-world data to improve the development and use of medicines.
    Berger ML; Lipset C; Gutteridge A; Axelsen K; Subedi P; Madigan D
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 25595243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness research (CER): a summary of AHRQ's CER on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.
    Oderda GM; Balfe LM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl B):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22073936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid learning: a breakthrough agenda.
    Etheredge LM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1155-62. PubMed ID: 25006141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing electronic health care predictive analytics: considerations and challenges.
    Amarasingham R; Patzer RE; Huesch M; Nguyen NQ; Xie B
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1148-54. PubMed ID: 25006140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Futurescapes: evidence expectations in the USA for comparative effectiveness research for drugs in 2020.
    Messner DA; Mohr P; Towse A
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Aug; 4(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 25730709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
    Wu AW; Kharrazi H; Boulware LE; Snyder CF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S12-20. PubMed ID: 23849145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making.
    Tunis SR; Messner DA; Mohr P; Gliklich RE; Dubois RW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 24237407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
    Umscheid CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research.
    Atkins D; Kupersmith J
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. PubMed ID: 21184866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers.
    Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S145-52. PubMed ID: 20473206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.
    Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA;
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological recommendations for comparative research on the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Sonnad SS; Goldsack JC; Mohr P; Tunis S
    J Wound Care; 2013 Sep; 22(9):470-80. PubMed ID: 24005781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-powered research networks aim to improve patient care and health research.
    Fleurence RL; Beal AC; Sheridan SE; Johnson LB; Selby JV
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1212-9. PubMed ID: 25006148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four health data networks illustrate the potential for a shared national multipurpose big-data network.
    Curtis LH; Brown J; Platt R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1178-86. PubMed ID: 25006144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.