These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25006184)
21. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Resnik DB; Elmore SA Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor. Bretscher A Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Apr; 24(7):887-9. PubMed ID: 23533210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why". Moliterno DJ JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective. Südhof TC PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study. Glonti K; Hren D BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. State of the journal 2017. Prystowsky EN J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):363-364. PubMed ID: 29537691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion]. Stijntjes F; Veeken H Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Highlights of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's 2009-2010 information for authors. Neal JM; Baker JD Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2009; 34(5):438-9. PubMed ID: 19749587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Reclaiming responsibility for setting standards. Johnston M Genetics; 2009 Feb; 181(2):355-6. PubMed ID: 19233837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On published research: a BOGSAT perspective. Scott JR; Drife J; Grimes D; Gabbe S; Branch DW; Smith R; Kochenour N BJOG; 2021 Oct; 128(11):1750-1751. PubMed ID: 34355848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical journal apologizes for violating own standards. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 2000 Feb; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11873786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ending the tyranny of the impact factor. Nat Cell Biol; 2014 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 24366027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review: (r)evolution needed. Sipido KR; Gal D; Luttun A; Janssens S; Sampaolesi M; Holvoet P Cardiovasc Res; 2017 Nov; 113(13):e54-e56. PubMed ID: 29088379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Too close to call. Curfman GD; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):832. PubMed ID: 11556307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]