These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25006511)

  • 1. Association of auditory steady state responses with perception of temporal modulations and speech in noise.
    Manju V; Gopika KK; Arivudai Nambi PM
    ISRN Otolaryngol; 2014; 2014():374035. PubMed ID: 25006511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Relationship between Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Assessments of Temporal Resolution.
    Heydari K; Tahaei AA; Pourbakht A; Haghani H; Nazeri A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):171-179. PubMed ID: 33873218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses.
    Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15937412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.
    Grose JH; Mamo SK; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 19633565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air-conduction auditory steady-state response: comparison of interchannel recording using two modulation frequencies.
    Kaf WA; Danesh AA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):696-707. PubMed ID: 19418709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplitude Modulation Perception and Cortical Evoked Potentials in Children With Listening Difficulties and Their Typically Developing Peers.
    Petley L; Blankenship C; Hunter LL; Stewart HJ; Lin L; Moore DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Feb; 67(2):633-656. PubMed ID: 38241680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.
    McClaskey CM; Dias JW; Harris KC
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 31365323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Full Informational Spectral Analysis for Auditory Steady-State Responses in Human Brain Using the Combination of Canonical Correlation Analysis and Holo-Hilbert Spectral Analysis.
    Lee PL; Lee TM; Lee WK; Chu NN; Shelepin YE; Hsu HT; Chang HH
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 35807153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory steady-state responses to monaural and diotic stimulation.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 13(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 22926721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.
    Rampp S; Rensch L; Simmermacher S; Rahne T; Strauss C; Prell J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):123-134. PubMed ID: 26852030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE; Bogo R; Berninger E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The optimal stimulation parameters of the free-field auditory steady-state responses].
    Tufatulin GS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(5):18-23. PubMed ID: 33140928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C; Sladen DP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):656-65. PubMed ID: 25365368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amplitude modulation perception and cortical evoked potentials in children with listening difficulties and their typically-developing peers.
    Petley L; Blankenship C; Hunter LL; Stewart HJ; Lin L; Moore DR
    medRxiv; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37961469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ipsilateral and contralateral recordings of the 40-Hz auditory steady state response (ASSR): Which one is better?
    Zakaria MN; Jalaei B; Sidek D
    B-ENT; 2016; 12(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 27097394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.