These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25007759)

  • 1. Examining the locus of the attentional attraction effect.
    Chow A; Gozli DG; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2389-97. PubMed ID: 25007759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.
    Santangelo V; Finoia P; Raffone A; Belardinelli MO; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 17763843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.
    Johnson JS; Spencer JP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1043-63. PubMed ID: 26810574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load.
    Lepsien J; Griffin IC; Devlin JT; Nobre AC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):733-43. PubMed ID: 15955482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint attention is intact even when visuospatial working memory is occupied.
    Yokoyama T; Kato R; Inoue K; Takeda Y
    Vision Res; 2019 Jan; 154():54-59. PubMed ID: 30414850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.
    Fortenbaugh FC; Sugarman A; Robertson LC; Esterman M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):442-461. PubMed ID: 30488191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection in spatial working memory is independent of perceptual selective attention, but they interact in a shared spatial priority map.
    Hedge C; Oberauer K; Leonards U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2653-68. PubMed ID: 26341873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The capacity and resolution of spatial working memory and its role in the storage of non-spatial features.
    McCants CW; Katus T; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():108-118. PubMed ID: 30550778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual spatial attention and spatial working memory do not draw on shared capacity-limited core processes.
    Howard CJ; Pole R; Montgomery P; Woodward A; Guest D; Standen B; Kent C; Crowe EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):799-818. PubMed ID: 31842721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oculomotor preparation as a rehearsal mechanism in spatial working memory.
    Pearson DG; Ball K; Smith DT
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 24908341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spatial configurations on the resolution of spatial working memory.
    Mutluturk A; Boduroglu A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2276-85. PubMed ID: 24939236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.
    Burke MR; Allen RJ; Gonzalez C
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):803-18. PubMed ID: 23155732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional cueing reverses deficits in spatial working memory task performance in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys.
    Decamp E; Tinker JP; Schneider JS
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 15196793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
    Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.