These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25008810)

  • 1. The New ICMJE Recommendations.
    Rosenberg J; Bauchner H; Backus J; De Leeuw P; Drazen J; Frizelle F; Godlee F; Haug C; James A; Laine C; Reyes H; Sahni P; Zhaori G
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2014; 32(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 25008810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication.
    Levine D; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2016 Jan; 278(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 26690988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Authorship and co-authorship].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewer development: new initiatives.
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25539228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Two years experience with the editorial. Manager successful implementation for "Der Ophthalmologe"].
    Holz FG
    Ophthalmologe; 2009 Jan; 106(1):5. PubMed ID: 19083003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
    Taylor D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts.
    Minion D; Sorial E; Endean E
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):391-3. PubMed ID: 17664118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. We are delighted to have received 273 replies from reviewers specifying their subspecialty interests. Introduction.
    Frank JD; Mouriquand P; Caldamone A; Malone PS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):223. PubMed ID: 22583554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On publication of a manuscript: the author, the reviewer and the editor.
    Tonkin M
    Hand Surg; 2013; 18(3):ix-x. PubMed ID: 24156598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Author Modifications of Accepted Manuscripts and Galley Proofs: Sharing of Ideas on the Issue.
    Wiwanitkit V
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W59. PubMed ID: 27809559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editors, reviewers and the work of the editorial board.
    Foster A
    Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):477-8. PubMed ID: 24025019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Physiol Genomics; 2013 Aug; 45(15):629-30. PubMed ID: 23695886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [When the editor makes an error].
    Hem E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication Takes Patience: Revision and Resubmission.
    Wood BD; Haynes KW
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 26377277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.