These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25009176)

  • 1. Missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Chaimani A; Efthimiou O; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2018 Aug; 21(3):123. PubMed ID: 25009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.
    Turner NL; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2062-80. PubMed ID: 25809313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Chaimani A; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 25009175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Higgins JP; White IR; Wood AM
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 18559412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated individual patient data.
    Yamaguchi Y; Sakamoto W; Goto M; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):322-51. PubMed ID: 26052956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective meta-analysis using individual patient data in intensive care medicine.
    Reade MC; Delaney A; Bailey MJ; Harrison DA; Yealy DM; Jones PG; Rowan KM; Bellomo R; Angus DC
    Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jan; 36(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 19760395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Missing predictors in models of effect size.
    Pigott TD
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Sep; 24(3):277-307. PubMed ID: 11523319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overstating the evidence: double counting in meta-analysis and related problems.
    Senn SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 19216779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Manning AK; Dupuis J
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1278-84. PubMed ID: 22551393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of studies with missing data.
    Yuan Y; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 18565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Same topic of systematic review, same conclusion?
    Tian JH; Li L; Liu AP; Yang KH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(10):5325. PubMed ID: 23244158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An approach for modelling multiple correlated outcomes in a network of interventions using odds ratios.
    Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Bagos P; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2275-87. PubMed ID: 24918246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 8202653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 23321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.