1537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25010296)
1. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor percentage but not number of tumor foci predicts disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy especially in high-risk patients.
Hinkelammert R; Eminaga O; Bettendorf O; Eltze E; Abbas M; Hertle L; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 24332639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of pathologic prostate-specific antigen mass ratio in patients with localized prostate cancer with negative surgical resection margins.
Lee S; Jeong CW; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Choi W; Byun SS; Lee SE
Urology; 2013 Oct; 82(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 23830078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
