These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25010296)

  • 1. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
    BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
    Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
    Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
    Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumor percentage but not number of tumor foci predicts disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy especially in high-risk patients.
    Hinkelammert R; Eminaga O; Bettendorf O; Eltze E; Abbas M; Hertle L; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 24332639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic value of pathologic prostate-specific antigen mass ratio in patients with localized prostate cancer with negative surgical resection margins.
    Lee S; Jeong CW; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Choi W; Byun SS; Lee SE
    Urology; 2013 Oct; 82(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 23830078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
    Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 78.