566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25010636)
1. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.
Neher T
Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():391. PubMed ID: 25538547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):262-270. PubMed ID: 31589137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
