These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25011463)

  • 21. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy and factors affecting its accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture.
    Jang S; Stevens T; Kou L; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):385-393.e1. PubMed ID: 31541625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
    Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
    Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures.
    Mohandas KM; Swaroop VS; Gullar SU; Dave UR; Jagannath P; DeSouza LJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):150-4. PubMed ID: 8013812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
    Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic p53 immunostaining of endobiliary brush cytology: preoperative cytology compared with the surgical specimen.
    Tascilar M; Sturm PD; Caspers E; Smit M; Polak MM; Huibregtse K; Noorduyn LA; Offerhaus GJ
    Cancer; 1999 Oct; 87(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10536357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Value of bile cytology associated with brush cytology of the bile duct: a comparative study of 115 patients].
    Fior-Gozlan M; Bosio C; Croset C; Bichard P
    Ann Pathol; 2006 Oct; 26(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 17255924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation.
    Harewood GC; Baron TH; Stadheim LM; Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Salomao DR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1464-9. PubMed ID: 15307861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of brush cytology in biliopancreatic strictures: a single-center cohort study.
    Ding SM; Lu AL; Xu BQ; Shi SH; Edoo MIA; Zheng SS; Li QY
    J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520987771. PubMed ID: 33557655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
    Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
    Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
    Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic accuracy of brush cytology with direct smear and cell-block techniques according to preparation order and tumor characteristics in biliary strictures.
    Jo YG; Lee TH; Cho HD; Park SH; Park JM; Cho YS; Jung Y; Chung IK; Choi HJ; Moon JH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Kim SJ
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 63(4):223-30. PubMed ID: 24755747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Significance of in vitro photodynamic cytodiagnosis with 5-aminolevulinic acid in biliary brush cytology for malignant biliary stricture.
    Hirao M; Hosui A; Mimura A; Ohnishi K; Tanimoto T; Okahara T; Sueyoshi Y; Goto T; Yamada T; Hiramatsu N
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Jun; 38():102756. PubMed ID: 35150900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bile duct brushings cytology--improving sensitivity of diagnosis using the ThinPrep technique: a review of 113 cases.
    Sheehan MM; Fraser A; Ravindran R; McAteer D
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 17488259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic yield and accuracy of a new cytology brush design compared to standard brush cytology for evaluation of biliary strictures.
    Bank JS; Witt BL; Taylor LJ; Adler DG
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):234-238. PubMed ID: 29230974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors affecting the accuracy of endoscopic transpapillary sampling methods for bile duct cancer.
    Nishikawa T; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Sugiyama H; Tawada K; Mikata R; Tada M; Ishihara T; Miyazaki M; Yokosuka O
    Dig Endosc; 2014 Mar; 26(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 23826684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biliary brushing cytology.
    Selvaggi SM
    Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 15056166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Ponsioen CY; Vrouenraets SM; van Milligen de Wit AW; Sturm P; Tascilar M; Offerhaus GJ; Prins M; Huibregtse K; Tytgat GN
    Endoscopy; 1999 May; 31(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 10376457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study.
    Draganov PV; Chauhan S; Wagh MS; Gupte AR; Lin T; Hou W; Forsmark CE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 22248602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.