These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25012203)

  • 1. Optimal number of strata for the stratified methods in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E48. PubMed ID: 25012203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Varying the valuating function and the presentable bank in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J
    Span J Psychol; 2011 May; 14(1):500-8. PubMed ID: 21568205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 17296125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.
    Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Mazuela P; Olea J
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 17296025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
    Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control.
    Chen JH; Chao HY; Chen SY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):182-196. PubMed ID: 32341606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does standard deviation matter? Using "standard deviation" to quantify security of multistage testing.
    Wang C; Zheng Y; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jan; 79(1):154-74. PubMed ID: 24323297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):749-771. PubMed ID: 30511327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing.
    He Y; Chen P
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study.
    Seo DG; Choi J; Kim J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2024; 21():18. PubMed ID: 38977033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):493-513. PubMed ID: 17681109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal Item Calibration for Computerized Achievement Tests.
    Ul Hassan M; Miller F
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1101-1128. PubMed ID: 31183669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Byrne BE; Spielman AI; Waldschmidt DM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 26933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.