These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25012634)

  • 1. Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview.
    Whittemore R; Chao A; Jang M; Minges KE; Park C
    Heart Lung; 2014; 43(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 25012634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.
    Young I; Waddell L; Sanchez J; Wilhelm B; McEwen SA; Rajić A
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24485274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method.
    Tricco AC; Soobiah C; Antony J; Cogo E; MacDonald H; Lillie E; Tran J; D'Souza J; Hui W; Perrier L; Welch V; Horsley T; Straus SE; Kastner M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():19-28. PubMed ID: 26891949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How applicable are results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of health behaviour maintenance? A critical evaluation.
    Loef M; Walach H
    Public Health; 2015 Apr; 129(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 25707931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence.
    Ludvigsen MS; Hall EO; Meyer G; Fegran L; Aagaard H; Uhrenfeldt L
    Qual Health Res; 2016 Feb; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 25794523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research.
    McCusker K; Gunaydin S
    Perfusion; 2015 Oct; 30(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 25378417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta-Reviews.
    Hennessy EA; Johnson BT; Keenan C
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Nov; 11(3):353-381. PubMed ID: 31290288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote.
    Peters MD
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2017; 36(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 28112629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research.
    Kapadia MZ; Askie L; Hartling L; Contopoulos-Ioannidis D; Bhutta ZA; Soll R; Moher D; Offringa M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010270. PubMed ID: 27091820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews.
    Hutton B; Wolfe D; Moher D; Shamseer L
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2017 May; 20(2):46-52. PubMed ID: 28363989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review and meta-analysis: tools for the information age.
    Weatherall M
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Nov; 93(1105):696-703. PubMed ID: 28756408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor A; Sargeant J
    Vet J; 2015 Dec; 206(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 26522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.
    Flemming K; Booth A; Hannes K; Cargo M; Noyes J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():79-85. PubMed ID: 29222060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.