BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25013121)

  • 1. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
    Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting recidivism with the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles and level of service inventory-revised: screening version.
    Walters GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Jun; 35(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 20464628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders.
    Walters GD; Lowenkamp CT
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Jun; 28(6):652-9. PubMed ID: 26237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles and Psychopathy Checklist: screening version as incrementally valid predictors of recidivism.
    Walters GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 19219541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response style versus crime-specific cognition: predicting disciplinary adjustment and recidivism in male and female offenders with the PICTS.
    Walters GD
    Assessment; 2007 Mar; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17314178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
    Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Cuervo VA; Murrie DC; Clark JW
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):418-27. PubMed ID: 24377910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders: risk ratios for static-99R.
    Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Helmus L; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):482-515. PubMed ID: 23264543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
    LeguĂ­zamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incremental validity of the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles as a predictor of continuous and dichotomous measures of recidivism.
    Walters GD
    Assessment; 2005 Mar; 12(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15695740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploration of criminal thinking styles among civil psychiatric patients.
    Carr WA; Rosenfeld B; Magyar M; Rotter M
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2009; 19(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 19908329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
    Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three Central Dimensions of Sexual Recidivism Risk: Understanding the Latent Constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R.
    Brouillette-Alarie S; Proulx J; Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Sep; 30(6):676-704. PubMed ID: 28183223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An item response theory analysis of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: comparing male and female probationers and prisoners.
    Walters GD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):1050-5. PubMed ID: 24978132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a hierarchical model of criminal thinking: evidence from item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Walters GD; Hagman BT; Cohn AM
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):925-36. PubMed ID: 21707187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex offender risk assessment: A reexamination of the coffee can study.
    Buttars A; Huss MT; Brack C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():31-6. PubMed ID: 26286489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criminal thought process as a dynamic risk factor: Variable- and person-oriented approaches to recidivism prediction.
    Walters GD; Cohen TH
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 26974366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of High-Intensity Inpatient Sex Offender Treatment in the Netherlands.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Aug; 28(5):469-85. PubMed ID: 24867416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Even highly correlated measures can add incrementally to predicting recidivism among sex offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Helmus L
    Assessment; 2012 Dec; 19(4):442-61. PubMed ID: 22946101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.