These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25014885)

  • 1. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
    Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir GS; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
    Bone; 2013 Nov; 57(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 23907032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.
    Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study--Reykjavik.
    Lang TF; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir G; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Chengshi J; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Keyak JH
    Bone; 2012 Mar; 50(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 22178403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D Finite Element Models Reconstructed From 2D Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Images Improve Hip Fracture Prediction Compared to Areal BMD in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden Cohort.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Jehpsson L; Ljunggren Ö; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Isaksson H
    J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1258-1267. PubMed ID: 37417707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.
    Bouxsein ML; Szulc P; Munoz F; Thrall E; Sornay-Rendu E; Delmas PD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Jun; 22(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 17352651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
    Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction in proximal femoral strength in patients with acute spinal cord injury.
    Edwards WB; Schnitzer TJ; Troy KL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Sep; 29(9):2074-9. PubMed ID: 24677293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study.
    Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir G; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Zhao S; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
    Bone; 2011 Jun; 48(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 21419886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biofidelic finite element models for accurately classifying hip fracture in a retrospective clinical study of elderly women from the AGES Reykjavik cohort.
    Enns-Bray WS; Bahaloo H; Fleps I; Pauchard Y; Taghizadeh E; Sigurdsson S; Aspelund T; Büchler P; Harris T; Gudnason V; Ferguson SJ; Pálsson H; Helgason B
    Bone; 2019 Mar; 120():25-37. PubMed ID: 30240961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.
    Bouxsein ML; Zysset P; Glüer CC; McClung M; Biver E; Pierroz DD; Ferrari SL;
    Osteoporos Int; 2020 Mar; 31(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 31900541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
    Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.
    Orwoll ES; Marshall LM; Nielson CM; Cummings SR; Lapidus J; Cauley JA; Ensrud K; Lane N; Hoffmann PR; Kopperdahl DL; Keaveny TM;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2009 Mar; 24(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 19049327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating in vivo fall assessments in the simulation of femoral fractures with finite element models.
    van der Zijden AM; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Groen BE; Nienhuis B; Weerdesteyn V; Tanck E
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jun; 37(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 25892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.
    Melton LJ; Riggs BL; Keaveny TM; Achenbach SJ; Hoffmann PF; Camp JJ; Rouleau PA; Bouxsein ML; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Robb RA; Khosla S
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1885-92. PubMed ID: 17680721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology.
    Zysset P; Pahr D; Engelke K; Genant HK; McClung MR; Kendler DL; Recknor C; Kinzl M; Schwiedrzik J; Museyko O; Wang A; Libanati C
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():122-130. PubMed ID: 26141837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European Society of Biomechanics S.M. Perren Award 2014: Safety factor of the proximal femur during gait: a population-based finite element study.
    Taddei F; Palmadori I; Taylor WR; Heller MO; Bordini B; Toni A; Schileo E
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3433-40. PubMed ID: 25280759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.