268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25015906)
1. Dental image replacement on cone beam computed tomography with three-dimensional optical scanning of a dental cast, occlusal bite, or bite tray impression.
Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1293-301. PubMed ID: 25015906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface.
Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19118978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.
Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 17538314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The corrected cast impression: an alternative technique.
Walton JN
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):779-81. PubMed ID: 20830890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy of digital dental models from cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions according to time elapsed after the impressions.
Lee SM; Hou Y; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 26827986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques.
Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel method for fusion of intra-oral scans and cone-beam computed tomography scans for orthognathic surgery planning.
de Waard O; Baan F; Verhamme L; Breuning H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26732637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a new method for building a three-dimensional physical model of the skull and dentition.
O'Neil M; Khambay B; Bowman A; Moos KF; Barbenel J; Walker F; Ayoub A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21194815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning.
Almutairi T; Naudi K; Nairn N; Ju X; Whitters J; Ayoub A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1561.e1-1561.e8. PubMed ID: 29572134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D morphological measurements of dental casts with occlusal relationship using microfocus X-ray CT.
Kamegawa M; Nakamura M; Tsutsumi S
Dent Mater J; 2008 Jul; 27(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 18833768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional virtual model surgery to fabricate the digital intermediate splint.
Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Politis C
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):563-5. PubMed ID: 23524742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
