251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25016321)
1. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux.
Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of laboratory water quality for studying initial bacterial adhesion during NF filtration processes.
Semião AJ; Habimana O; Cao H; Heffernan R; Safari A; Casey E
Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2909-20. PubMed ID: 23541307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration.
Heffernan R; Habimana O; Semião AJ; Cao H; Safari A; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():118-28. PubMed ID: 25265304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct observation of bacterial deposition onto clean and organic-fouled polyamide membranes.
Subramani A; Huang X; Hoek EM
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Aug; 336(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 19406423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upon impact: the fate of adhering Pseudomonas fluorescens cells during nanofiltration.
Habimana O; Semião AJ; Casey E
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9641-50. PubMed ID: 25072514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofilm recruitment under nanofiltration conditions: the influence of resident biofilm structural parameters on planktonic cell invasion.
Habimana O; Casey E
Microb Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 11(1):264-267. PubMed ID: 29194975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
Wang YN; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization.
Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bacterial attachment to RO membranes surface-modified by concentration-polarization-enhanced graft polymerization.
Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):5973-80. PubMed ID: 21682251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic analysis of micromixers to minimize biofouling on reverse osmosis membranes.
Altman SJ; McGrath LK; Jones HD; Sanchez A; Noek R; Clem P; Cook A; Ho CK
Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(12):3545-54. PubMed ID: 20493509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: positively contributing factors of Sphingomonas.
Gutman J; Herzberg M; Walker SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):13941-50. PubMed ID: 25354089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vacuum membrane distillation of seawater reverse osmosis brines.
Mericq JP; Laborie S; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5260-73. PubMed ID: 20659753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
