216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25016553)
1. Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study.
Kitson SJ; Greig E; Michael E; Smith M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():51-5. PubMed ID: 25016553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital.
van Velthoven K; Poppe W; Verschuere H; Arbyn M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():224-231. PubMed ID: 28822944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early and late pregnancy outcomes in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a retrospective cohort study.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Panikkar J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 297(4):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 29404740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity.
Khalid S; Dimitriou E; Conroy R; Paraskevaidis E; Kyrgiou M; Harrity C; Arbyn M; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 22329499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Cruickshank ME; Flannelly G; Campbell DM; Kitchener HC
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jun; 102(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 7632638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study.
Jančar N; Mihevc Ponikvar B; Tomšič S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():245-9. PubMed ID: 27359080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study.
Castanon A; Landy R; Brocklehurst P; Evans H; Peebles D; Singh N; Walker P; Patnick J; Sasieni P;
BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6223. PubMed ID: 25378384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis.
Pils S; Eppel W; Seemann R; Natter C; Ott J
BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 24148580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Poon LC; Savvas M; Zamblera D; Skyfta E; Nicolaides KH
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 22329452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.
Pecourt M; Gondry J; Foulon A; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Chevreau J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101621. PubMed ID: 31430562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.
Howells RE; O'Mahony F; Tucker H; Millinship J; Jones PW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 11002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does LLETZ excision margin status predict residual disease in women who have undergone post-treatment cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing?
Palmer JE; Ravenscroft S; Ellis K; Crossley J; Dudding N; Smith JH; Tidy JA
Cytopathology; 2016 Jun; 27(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 26415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study.
Carcopino X; Maycock JA; Mancini J; Jeffers M; Farrar K; Martin M; Khalid S; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 23228032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of past obstetric history and cervical excision on preterm birth rate.
Collins A; Motiwale T; Barney O; Dudbridge F; McParland PC; Moss EL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Nov; 100(11):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 34698370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
