These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25016578)

  • 1. The aesthetic impact of upper lip inclination in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25016578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nasofrontal Angle and Nasal Dorsal Aesthetics: A Quantitative Investigation of Idealized and Normative Values.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    Facial Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 27494590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Submental-Cervical Angle: Perceived Attractiveness and Threshold Values of Desire for Surgery.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Dec; 15(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 27833339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mentolabial angle and aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 39(1):4. PubMed ID: 28217687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: A quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 26880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative investigation of the esthetic impact of lip prominence in relation to the esthetic line.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Garagiola U; Wertheim D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 May; 159(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 33653639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of upper lip inclination on facial profile attractiveness: A perceptive analysis.
    Bora P; Agrawal P; Bagga DK; Priya K; Singh N; Bhardwaj R
    J Orthod Sci; 2024; 13():8. PubMed ID: 38516111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 21846874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysing chin prominence in relation to the lower lip: The lower lip-chin prominence angle.
    Naini FB; Garagiola U; Wertheim D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1310-1316. PubMed ID: 31331858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Opinion of Different Observer Groups About the Esthetic Impact and Need for Surgical Correction of Varying Submental Lengths.
    Naini FB; Laskin DM; Garagiola U; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 78(4):630.e1-630.e9. PubMed ID: 31881172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 22340990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.
    Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip.
    Nandini S; Prashanth CS; Somiah SK; Reddy SR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 22186808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.