254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25017013)
1. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.
Canturk BH; Celikoglu M
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25017013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class III malocclusion.
Liu Y; Hou R; Jin H; Zhang X; Wu Z; Li Z; Guo J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):321-332. PubMed ID: 33487499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of tooth borne versus skeletally anchored Alt-RAMEC protocol in early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a single-centre randomized clinical trial.
Alzoubi EE; Camilleri S; Al Muzian M; Attard N
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 45(5):517-527. PubMed ID: 37167546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective long-term comparison of early RME-facemask versus late Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC and miniscrew-supported intraoral elastics in growing Class III patients.
Papadopoulou AK; Koletsi D; Masucci C; Giuntini V; Franchi L; Darendeliler MA
Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100603. PubMed ID: 34972642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.
Halicioglu K; Yavuz I; Ceylan I; Erdem A
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report.
Kathem SJ; Matras RC; Abbas SOM
J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 37392009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the short-term effects of facemask therapy preceded by conventional rapid maxillary expansion or by an alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol : A retrospective study.
Akbulut S; Yilmaz S; Yagci A
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Sep; 84(5):278-286. PubMed ID: 35257194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal, soft tissue, and airway changes following the alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol.
Yilmaz BS; Kucukkeles N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 24621102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class III malocclusion: A prospective study.
Fischer B; Masucci C; Ruellas A; Cevidanes L; Giuntini V; Nieri M; Nardi C; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Defraia E
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Nov; 21(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 30253035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early Alt-RAMEC and facial mask protocol in class III malocclusion.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; Masucci C; Defraia E
J Clin Orthod; 2011 Nov; 45(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 22500360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.
Nienkemper M; Wilmes B; Pauls A; Drescher D
Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 24325812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
