BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25017301)

  • 1. Viscoelastic characterisation of pig liver in unconfined compression.
    Mattei G; Tirella A; Gallone G; Ahluwalia A
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2641-6. PubMed ID: 25017301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The region-dependent dynamic properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression.
    Fernández P; Jesús Lamela M; Ramos A; Fernández-Canteli A; Tanaka E
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):845-8. PubMed ID: 23261240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The nano-epsilon dot method for strain rate viscoelastic characterisation of soft biomaterials by spherical nano-indentation.
    Mattei G; Gruca G; Rijnveld N; Ahluwalia A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():150-9. PubMed ID: 26143307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A strain-hardening bi-power law for the nonlinear behaviour of biological soft tissues.
    Nicolle S; Vezin P; Palierne JF
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 19954778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Viscoelastic characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression.
    Allen KD; Athanasiou KA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 16321633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of normal compression on the shear modulus of soft tissue in rheological measurements.
    Ayyildiz M; Cinoglu S; Basdogan C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():235-43. PubMed ID: 26042768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of experimental protocols on the mechanical properties of the intervertebral disc in unconfined compression.
    Recuerda M; Coté SP; Villemure I; Périé D
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071006. PubMed ID: 21823745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strain rate viscoelastic analysis of soft and highly hydrated biomaterials.
    Tirella A; Mattei G; Ahluwalia A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Oct; 102(10):3352-60. PubMed ID: 23946054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties by Transient Elastography: comparison with Dynamic Mechanical Analysis.
    Chatelin S; Oudry J; Périchon N; Sandrin L; Allemann P; Soler L; Willinger R
    Biorheology; 2011; 48(2):75-88. PubMed ID: 21811013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viscoelastic behaviour of hydrogel-based composites for tissue engineering under mechanical load.
    Kocen R; Gasik M; Gantar A; Novak S
    Biomed Mater; 2017 Mar; 12(2):025004. PubMed ID: 28106535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Wharton׳s jelly poroelastic parameters through compressive tests on placental and foetal ends of human umbilical cords.
    Gervaso F; Boschetti F; Pennati G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():51-8. PubMed ID: 24743056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Biphasic Transversely Isotropic Poroviscoelastic Model for the Unconfined Compression of Hydrated Soft Tissue.
    Hatami-Marbini H; Maulik R
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Mar; 138(3):4032059. PubMed ID: 26593630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress-relaxation response of human menisci under confined compression conditions.
    Martin Seitz A; Galbusera F; Krais C; Ignatius A; Dürselen L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Oct; 26():68-80. PubMed ID: 23811278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viscoelastic shear properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc.
    Wu Y; Kuo J; Wright GJ; Cisewski SE; Wei F; Kern MJ; Yao H
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):156-63. PubMed ID: 25865544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device.
    Valtorta D; Mazza E
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Oct; 9(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 16006169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rate dependent biomechanical properties of corneal stroma in unconfined compression.
    Hatami-Marbini H; Etebu E
    Biorheology; 2013; 50(3-4):133-47. PubMed ID: 23863279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probing mechanical properties of fully hydrated gels and biological tissues.
    Constantinides G; Kalcioglu ZI; McFarland M; Smith JF; Van Vliet KJ
    J Biomech; 2008 Nov; 41(15):3285-9. PubMed ID: 18922534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear and viscoelastic characteristics of skin under compression: experiment and analysis.
    Wu JZ; Dong RG; Smutz WP; Schopper AW
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 14646052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver tissue characterization from uniaxial stress-strain data using probabilistic and inverse finite element methods.
    Fu YB; Chui CK; Teo CL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():105-12. PubMed ID: 23455167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach.
    Linde F
    Dan Med Bull; 1994 Apr; 41(2):119-38. PubMed ID: 8039429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.