These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25018053)

  • 1. Alternative stable states and alternative endstates of community assembly through intra- and interspecific positive and negative interactions.
    Gerla DJ; Mooij WM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Sep; 96():8-18. PubMed ID: 25018053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative frequency-dependent growth underlies the stable coexistence of two cosmopolitan aquatic plants.
    Armitage DW; Jones SE
    Ecology; 2019 May; 100(5):e02657. PubMed ID: 30770565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities.
    Gross K
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Sep; 11(9):929-36. PubMed ID: 18485001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Community structure and the interplay between interspecific infection and competition.
    Bowers RG; Turner J
    J Theor Biol; 1997 Jul; 187(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 9236112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Species coexistence under resource competition with intraspecific and interspecific direct competition in a chemostat.
    Saito Y; Miki T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Nov; 78(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 20674582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
    Adler PB; Smull D; Beard KH; Choi RT; Furniss T; Kulmatiski A; Meiners JM; Tredennick AT; Veblen KE
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 29938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signs of stabilisation and stable coexistence.
    Broekman MJE; Muller-Landau HC; Visser MD; Jongejans E; Wright SJ; de Kroon H
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1957-1975. PubMed ID: 31328414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-way coexistence in obligate mutualist-exploiter interactions: the potential role of competition.
    Morris WF; Bronstein JL; Wilson WG
    Am Nat; 2003 Jun; 161(6):860-75. PubMed ID: 12858272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social information drives ecological outcomes among competing species.
    Gil MA; Baskett ML; Schreiber SJ
    Ecology; 2019 Nov; 100(11):e02835. PubMed ID: 31330041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraspecific variation and species coexistence.
    Lichstein JW; Dushoff J; Levin SA; Pacala SW
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18171164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allee effects can both conserve and create spatial heterogeneity in population densities.
    Gyllenberg M; Hemminki J; Tammaru T
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Dec; 56(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 10607518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): effects of intra- vs. interspecific competition.
    Caruso CM
    Am J Bot; 1999 May; 86(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 10330069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scramble competitions can rescue endangered species subject to strong Allee effects.
    Kang Y
    Math Biosci; 2013 Jan; 241(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 23022028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-species coexistence in Lotka-Volterra competitive systems with crowding effects.
    Gavina MKA; Tahara T; Tainaka KI; Ito H; Morita S; Ichinose G; Okabe T; Togashi T; Nagatani T; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1198. PubMed ID: 29352250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive interactions and the emergence of community structure in metacommunities.
    Filotas E; Grant M; Parrott L; Rikvold PA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 20627108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for interspecific competition and age structure in demographic analyses of density dependence improves predictions of fluctuations in population size.
    Gamelon M; Vriend SJG; Engen S; Adriaensen F; Dhondt AA; Evans SR; Matthysen E; Sheldon BC; Saether BE
    Ecol Lett; 2019 May; 22(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 30816630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interspecific facilitation mediates the outcome of intraspecific interactions across an elevational gradient.
    Raath-Krüger MJ; Schöb C; McGeoch MA; le Roux PC
    Ecology; 2021 Jan; 102(1):e03200. PubMed ID: 32970842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of hawk-dove game on the dynamics of two competing species.
    Moussaoui A; Auger P; Roche B
    Acta Biotheor; 2014 Sep; 62(3):385-404. PubMed ID: 24908380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.