747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25018135)
21. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.
Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of Recurrence and Mortality of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients Using Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters: Intratumoral Heterogeneity, SUV, and Volumetric Parameters.
Chang S; Kim SJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2016 Feb; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26844846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer.
Liao S; Penney BC; Zhang H; Suzuki K; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 22142679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Metabolic response of lymph nodes immediately after RT is related with survival outcome of patients with pelvic node-positive cervical cancer using consecutive [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Yoon MS; Ahn SJ; Nah BS; Chung WK; Song HC; Yoo SW; Song JY; Jeong JU; Nam TK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(4):e491-7. PubMed ID: 22818418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of occult lymph node metastasis using volume-based PET parameters in small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer.
Park SY; Yoon JK; Park KJ; Lee SJ
Cancer Imaging; 2015 Dec; 15():21. PubMed ID: 26694918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation between FDG uptake by PET/CT and the expressions of glucose transporter type 1 and hexokinase II in cervical cancer.
Tong SY; Lee JM; Ki KD; Choi YJ; Seol HJ; Lee SK; Huh CY; Kim GY; Lim SJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 22398711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Hyun SH; Choi JY; Shim YM; Kim K; Lee SJ; Cho YS; Lee JY; Lee KH; Kim BT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19826877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastasis depends on metabolic activity of the primary lesion in thoracic squamous esophageal cancer.
Manabe O; Hattori N; Hirata K; Itoh K; Hosokawa M; Takahashi H; Oyama-Manabe N; Tamaki N
J Nucl Med; 2013 May; 54(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 23516310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Martinez A; Voglimacci M; Lusque A; Ducassou A; Gladieff L; Dupuis N; Angeles MA; Martinez C; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Chantalat E; Hitzel A; Courbon F; Ferron G; Gabiache E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 31915897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Areas of high 18F-FDG uptake on preradiotherapy PET/CT identify preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Calais J; Thureau S; Dubray B; Modzelewski R; Thiberville L; Gardin I; Vera P
J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 25572091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. (18)F-FDG PET/CT mean SUV and metabolic tumor volume for mean survival time in non-small cell lung cancer.
Kurtipek E; Çayci M; Düzgün N; Esme H; Terzi Y; Bakdik S; Aygün MS; Unlü Y; Burnik C; Bekci TT
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):459-63. PubMed ID: 25742234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship between primary lesion metabolic parameters and clinical stage in lung cancer.
Sahiner I; Atasever T; Akdemir UO; Ozturk C; Memis L
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2013; 32(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 23747221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of different segmentation algorithms on metabolic tumor volume measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma.
Xu W; Yu S; Ma Y; Liu C; Xin J
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Mar; 38(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28118260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]