These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25018770)

  • 1. Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.
    Cozzani M; Pasini M; Zallio F; Ritucci R; Mutinelli S; Mazzotta L; Giuca MR; Piras V
    Int J Dent; 2014; 2014():937059. PubMed ID: 25018770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.
    Caprioglio A; Cafagna A; Fontana M; Cozzani M
    Korean J Orthod; 2015 Jul; 45(4):171-9. PubMed ID: 26258063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Distal-Jet with Dental Anchorage to Distal-Jet with Skeletal Anchorage: A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study.
    Altieri F; Mezio M; Guarnieri R; Cassetta M
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between direct vs indirect anchorage in two miniscrew-supported distalizing devices.
    Cozzani M; Fontana M; Maino G; Maino G; Palpacelli L; Caprioglio A
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 26222412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
    Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Miniscrew-supported distal jet versus conventional distal jet appliance: A pilot study.
    Cassetta M; Brandetti G; Altieri F
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e650-e658. PubMed ID: 31516664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
    Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
    Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.
    Kırcalı M; Yüksel AS
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 31(4):103-109. PubMed ID: 30701219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review.
    Kinzinger GS; Eren M; Diedrich PR
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):558-71. PubMed ID: 18820306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer.
    Sodagar A; Ahmad Akhoundi MS; Rafighii A; Arab S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2011; 8(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 22457837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 8972811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Cambiano AO; Janson G; Fuziy A; Garib DG; Lorenzoni DC
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):141-146. PubMed ID: 29119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.