174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25019110)
1. Effect of mini-implant-supported mandibular overdentures on electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle during chewing of hard and soft food.
Ashmawy TM; El Talawy DB; Shaheen NH
Quintessence Int; 2014 Sep; 45(8):663-71. PubMed ID: 25019110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
ElSyad MA; Ibrahim AE; Nawar NHH; Belal TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masticatory function with ball and resilient telescopic anchors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Shawky AF
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 28681044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EMG activity of the masseter muscle in implant supported overdenture wearers during chewing of hard and soft food.
Karkazis HC
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Oct; 29(10):986-91. PubMed ID: 12421330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
ELsyad MA; El-Asfahani IA; Kortam SA; Mourad SI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of varying implant position in immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Shaarawy MA; Aboelross EM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 23339758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 1-year prospective cohort study on mandibular overdentures retained by mini dental implants.
Scepanovic M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Markovic A; Delgardo-Ruiz R; Todorovic A; Milicic B; Misic T
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 23304690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electromyography evaluation of masseter and temporalis, bite force, and quality of life in elderly patients during the adaptation of mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Sônego MV; Goiato MC; Dos Santos DM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):e169-e174. PubMed ID: 27616640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electromyographic evaluation of mastication and swallowing in elderly individuals with mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses.
Berretin-Felix G; Nary Filho H; Padovani CR; Trindade Junior AS; Machado WM
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19089202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional versus implant-retained overlay dentures: a pilot study of masseter and anterior temporalis electromyography.
Dakhilalian M; Rismanchian M; Fazel A; Basiri K; Azadeh H; Mahmoodi M; Fayazi S; Sadr-Eshkvari P
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 25106005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers.
Roumanas ED; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Kapur KK
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 14714839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.
Zygogiannis K; Aartman IH; Parsa A; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1377-1388. PubMed ID: 29140382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chewing-induced regional brain activity in edentulous patients who received mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a preliminary report.
Kimoto K; Ono Y; Tachibana A; Hirano Y; Otsuka T; Ohno A; Yamaya K; Obata T; Onozuka M
J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Apr; 55(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 20951664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction and prosthetic aspects with mini-implants retained mandibular overdentures. A 5-year prospective study.
Elsyad MA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):926-33. PubMed ID: 26129836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.
Zygogiannis K; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 29340354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
