257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25019410)
1. Multidimensional assessment of strongly irregular voices such as in substitution voicing and spasmodic dysphonia: a compilation of own research.
Moerman M; Martens JP; Dejonckere P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 25019410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools.
Siemons-Lühring DI; Moerman M; Martens JP; Deuster D; Müller F; Dejonckere P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 266(12):1915-22. PubMed ID: 19866529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of consonant voicing characteristics on sentence production in abductor versus adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
Cannito MP; Chorna LB; Kahane JC; Dworkin JP
J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):394.e13-22. PubMed ID: 24440058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tridimensional assessment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia pre- and post-treatment with Botulinum toxin.
Dejonckere PH; Neumann KJ; Moerman MB; Martens JP; Giordano A; Manfredi C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1195-203. PubMed ID: 22210475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia in Mandarin-speaking Chinese.
Chen Z; Li J; Ren Q; Ge P
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 29449062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Measure of the Auditory-perceptual Quality of Strain from Electroglottographic Analysis of Continuous Dysphonic Speech: Application to Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.
Somanath K; Mau T
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):770.e9-770.e21. PubMed ID: 26739857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and Validity of Speech Evaluation in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.
Yanagida S; Nishizawa N; Hashimoto R; Mizoguchi K; Hatakeyama H; Homma A; Fukuda S
J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):585-591. PubMed ID: 28802787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated acoustic analysis of task dependency in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia.
Roy N; Mazin A; Awan SN
Laryngoscope; 2014 Mar; 124(3):718-24. PubMed ID: 23946147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
Peterson EA; Roy N; Awan SN; Merrill RM; Banks R; Tanner K
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types.
Gaskill CS; Awan JA; Watts CR; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):218-228. PubMed ID: 27241579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the perception of dysphonia severity language-dependent? A comparison of French and Italian voice assessments.
Ghio A; Cantarella G; Weisz F; Robert D; Woisard V; Fussi F; Giovanni A; Baracca G
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24083896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
