These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25019558)

  • 1. Challenges, applications, and recent advances of protein-ligand docking in structure-based drug design.
    Grinter SZ; Zou X
    Molecules; 2014 Jul; 19(7):10150-76. PubMed ID: 25019558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Int J Mol Sci; 2010 Aug; 11(8):3016-34. PubMed ID: 21152288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies.
    Ferreira LG; Dos Santos RN; Oliva G; Andricopulo AD
    Molecules; 2015 Jul; 20(7):13384-421. PubMed ID: 26205061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.
    Xu X; Ma Z; Duan R; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Mar; 33(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 30689079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein-Ligand Docking in Drug Design: Performance Assessment and Binding-Pose Selection.
    Ballante F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1824():67-88. PubMed ID: 30039402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.
    Elokely KM; Doerksen RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1934-45. PubMed ID: 23530568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MDock: A Suite for Molecular Inverse Docking and Target Prediction.
    Ma Z; Zou X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():313-322. PubMed ID: 33759135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Charting a Path to Success in Virtual Screening.
    Forli S
    Molecules; 2015 Oct; 20(10):18732-58. PubMed ID: 26501243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined strategies in structure-based virtual screening.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Shen C; Hu X; Gao J; Li D; Cao D; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2020 Feb; 22(6):3149-3159. PubMed ID: 31995074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.
    Gan JL; Kumar D; Chen C; Taylor BC; Jagger BR; Amaro RE; Lee CT
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Feb; 36(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 35199221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.