These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2502095)

  • 1. [Automatic quantitative analysis of vascular stenosis. Experimental study of a digital angiography system applied to cardiology].
    Boller A; Lesperance J; Revel D; Marchand JL; Amiel M
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Mar; 82(3):381-90. PubMed ID: 2502095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method.
    Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Anderson MH; Cooper IC; Webb-Peploe MW
    Am Heart J; 1988 Nov; 116(5 Pt 1):1181-7. PubMed ID: 2973213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
    Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitation of absolute area of a coronary arterial stenosis: experimental validation with a preparation in vivo.
    Wiesel J; Grunwald AM; Tobiasz C; Robin B; Bodenheimer MM
    Circulation; 1986 Nov; 74(5):1099-106. PubMed ID: 3769167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
    Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quantitative coronary angiography: methodologic principles of a densitometric procedure].
    Sievert H; Bakim E; Kober G; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Jan; 77(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 3363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE; Booth DC; Harrison M; Grayburn P; Elion JL; DeMaria AN
    Circulation; 1988 Dec; 78(6):1411-20. PubMed ID: 3191595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.
    Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Liu Y; Wise SW; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Mauger DT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1171-6. PubMed ID: 11641196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative coronary arteriography: design and validation.
    Ratib OM; Mankovich NJ
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 3363133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification.
    LeFree MT; Simon SB; Mancini GB; Bates ER; Vogel RA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Mar; 23(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3372175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography.
    Bray BE; Anderson FL; Hardin CW; Kruger RA; Sutton RB; Nelson JA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First clinical results with digital flashing tomosynthesis in coronary angiography.
    Haaker P; Klotz E; Koppe R; Linde R; Mathey DG
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Nov; 6(11):913-20. PubMed ID: 3908106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quantification of vascular stenoses using digital subtraction angiography].
    Herter M; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 3001855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital thermo-coronary angiography--development and validation of the method in comparison with conventional cine-coronary angiography].
    Mohr FW; Grundfest W; Litvack F; Forrester J; Matloff J; Kirchhoff PG
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Jul; 78(7):441-52. PubMed ID: 2773540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Geometry of eccentric vascular stenoses in various projections--significance for angiographic assessment of the degree of stenosis, especially using digital subtraction angiography].
    Neufang KF
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Dec; 6(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 3545633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software.
    Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.