BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25022452)

  • 1. Non-rigid registration of serial dedicated breast CT, longitudinal dedicated breast CT and PET/CT images using the diffeomorphic demons method.
    Santos J; Chaudhari AJ; Joshi AA; Ferrero A; Yang K; Boone JM; Badawi RD
    Phys Med; 2014 Sep; 30(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 25022452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of GMI and PMI diffeomorphic-based demons algorithms for aligning PET and CT Images.
    Yang J; Wang H; Zhang Y; Yin Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):18–30. PubMed ID: 26218993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.
    Gazi PM; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Yang K; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6322-46. PubMed ID: 27494376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners.
    Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
    Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT-PET weighted image fusion for separately scanned whole body rat.
    Suh JW; Kwon OK; Scheinost D; Sinusas AJ; Cline GW; Papademetris X
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):533-42. PubMed ID: 22225323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic arm removal in PET and CT images for deformable registration.
    Gong L; Pathak S; Alessio A; Kinahan P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Dec; 30(8):469-77. PubMed ID: 17084065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attenuation correction in 4D-PET using a single-phase attenuation map and rigidity-adaptive deformable registration.
    Kalantari F; Wang J
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):522-532. PubMed ID: 27987223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.
    Krishnamoorthy S; Vent T; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA; Karp JS; Surti S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235028. PubMed ID: 33113520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Registration of PET and CT images based on multiresolution gradient of mutual information demons algorithm for positioning esophageal cancer patients.
    Jin S; Li D; Wang H; Yin Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):3931. PubMed ID: 23318381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity study of voxel-based PET image comparison to image registration algorithms.
    Yip S; Chen AB; Aerts HJ; Berbeco R
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111714. PubMed ID: 25370628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results.
    Atuegwu NC; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Abramson RG; Williams JM; Chakravarthy AB; Abramson VG; Yankeelov TE
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052302. PubMed ID: 24784395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
    Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whole-body PET/CT imaging: combining software- and hardware-based co-registration.
    Weigert M; Pietrzyk U; Müller S; Palm C; Beyer T
    Z Med Phys; 2008; 18(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 18524389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward physiologically motivated registration of diagnostic CT and PET/CT of lung volumes.
    Baluwala HY; Risser L; Schnabel JA; Saddi KA
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021903. PubMed ID: 23387751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A momentum-based diffeomorphic demons framework for deformable MR-CT image registration.
    Han R; De Silva T; Ketcha M; Uneri A; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215006. PubMed ID: 30353886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction of an image size difference between positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) improves image fusion of dedicated PET and CT.
    Vogel WV; van Dalen JA; Schinagl DA; Kaanders JH; Huisman H; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Jun; 27(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 16710106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images.
    Sen A; Anderson BM; Cazoulat G; McCulloch MM; Elganainy D; McDonald BA; He Y; Mohamed ASR; Elgohari BA; Zaid M; Koay EJ; Brock KK
    Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1670-1679. PubMed ID: 31958147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging.
    Bowen SL; Wu Y; Chaudhari AJ; Fu L; Packard NJ; Burkett GW; Yang K; Lindfors KK; Shelton DK; Hagge R; Borowsky AD; Martinez SR; Qi J; Boone JM; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 19690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.