197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25022523)
1. Microbial community diversity in anaerobic reactors digesting turkey, chicken, and swine wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Shushlyaev RV; Miluykov VA; Vankov PY; Ziganshin AM
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):1464-772. PubMed ID: 25022523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of anaerobic digestion strategies of nitrogen-rich substrates: Performance of anaerobic reactors and microbial community diversity.
Ziganshina EE; Ibragimov EM; Vankov PY; Miluykov VA; Ziganshin AM
Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():160-171. PubMed ID: 27836515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the Organic Loading Rate Increase and the Presence of Zeolite on Microbial Community Composition and Process Stability During Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Ilinskaya ON; Boulygina EA; Grigoryeva TV; Ziganshin AM
Microb Ecol; 2015 Nov; 70(4):948-60. PubMed ID: 26045158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Archaeal and Bacterial Community Structure in an Anaerobic Digestion Reactor (Lagoon Type) Used for Biogas Production at a Pig Farm.
Pampillón-González L; Ortiz-Cornejo NL; Luna-Guido M; Dendooven L; Navarro-Noya YE
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017; 27(5):306-317. PubMed ID: 29186720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial community shifts in biogas reactors upon complete or partial ammonia inhibition.
Lv Z; Leite AF; Harms H; Glaser K; Liebetrau J; Kleinsteuber S; Nikolausz M
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Jan; 103(1):519-533. PubMed ID: 30334088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion reactors for treating organic urban residues during the start-up process.
Alcántara-Hernández RJ; Taş N; Carlos-Pinedo S; Durán-Moreno A; Falcón LI
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jun; 64(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 28295427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of the substrate feeding regime on methanogenic activity in biogas reactors approached by molecular and stable isotope methods.
Lv Z; Leite AF; Harms H; Richnow HH; Liebetrau J; Nikolausz M
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():91-9. PubMed ID: 24291758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anaerobic digestion of pig manure supernatant at high ammonia concentrations characterized by high abundances of Methanosaeta and non-euryarchaeotal archaea.
Nordgård ASR; Bergland WH; Vadstein O; Mironov V; Bakke R; Østgaard K; Bakke I
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15077. PubMed ID: 29118356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the substrate loading regime and phosphoric acid supplementation on performance of biogas reactors and microbial community dynamics during anaerobic digestion of chicken wastes.
Belostotskiy DE; Ziganshina EE; Siniagina M; Boulygina EA; Miluykov VA; Ziganshin AM
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():42-52. PubMed ID: 26117234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the start-up process of anaerobic digestion utilizing swine manure:
Lv Z; Liang J; Chen X; Chen Z; Jiang J; Loake GJ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(13):13275-13285. PubMed ID: 30895553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a biogas reactor fed with swine feces as the mono-substrate by mcrA analysis.
Zhu C; Zhang J; Tang Y; Zhengkai X; Song R
Microbiol Res; 2011 Jan; 166(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 20116227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioenergy production from diluted poultry manure and microbial consortium inside Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactor at sub-mesophilic conditions.
Jaxybayeva A; Yangin-Gomec C; Cetecioglu Z; Ozbayram EG; Yilmaz F; Ince O
J Environ Sci Health B; 2014; 49(10):775-85. PubMed ID: 25065830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biogas Upgrading via Hydrogenotrophic Methanogenesis in Two-Stage Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors at Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions.
Bassani I; Kougias PG; Treu L; Angelidaki I
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12585-93. PubMed ID: 26390125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Analysis of Methanogenic Communities in Different Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters.
Ziganshin AM; Ziganshina EE; Kleinsteuber S; Nikolausz M
Archaea; 2016; 2016():3401272. PubMed ID: 28074084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaerobic digestion of manure and mixture of manure with lipids: biogas reactor performance and microbial community analysis.
Mladenovska Z; Dabrowski S; Ahring BK
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(6):271-8. PubMed ID: 14640228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prokaryote community dynamics in anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure, rice straw and industrial clay residuals.
Jiménez J; Theuerl S; Bergmann I; Klocke M; Guerra G; Romero-Romero O
Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 27533857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with food wastes via bio-methane potential assay and CSTR reactor.
Ye Y; Zamalloa C; Lin H; Yan M; Schmidt D; Hu B
J Environ Sci Health B; 2015; 50(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 25602155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65 degrees C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure.
Ahring BK; Ibrahim AA; Mladenovska Z
Water Res; 2001 Jul; 35(10):2446-52. PubMed ID: 11394779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a biogas-generating microbial community in a pilot-scale anaerobic reactor.
Ziganshina EE; Bagmanova AR; Khilyas IV; Ziganshin AM
J Biosci Bioeng; 2014 Jun; 117(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24418257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial diversity and dynamicity of biogas reactors due to radical changes of feedstock composition.
De Francisci D; Kougias PG; Treu L; Campanaro S; Angelidaki I
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 176():56-64. PubMed ID: 25460984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
