These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25023146)

  • 1. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
    Gray K
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):329-31. PubMed ID: 25023146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Purity matters more than harm in moral judgments of suicide: response to Gray (2014).
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):332-4. PubMed ID: 25017511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations.
    Tepe B; Aydinli-Karakulak A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Aug; 117(2):310-337. PubMed ID: 30614730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
    Gray K; Schein C; Ward AF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1600-15. PubMed ID: 24635184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
    Ward SJ; King LA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):825-849. PubMed ID: 28627916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No Absolutism Here: Harm Predicts Moral Judgment 30× Better Than Disgust-Commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016).
    Gray K; Schein C
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 11(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 27217244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality.
    Gray K; Young L; Waytz A
    Psychol Inq; 2012 Apr; 23(2):101-124. PubMed ID: 22754268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The puzzle of wrongless harms: Some potential concerns for dyadic morality and related accounts.
    Royzman EB; Borislow SH
    Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104980. PubMed ID: 34990961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
    Chakroff A; Young L
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm.
    Rottman J; Young L
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 31242081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.