These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25023707)
1. Effect of time and pH on physical-chemical properties of orthodontic brackets and wires. Dos Santos AA; Pithon MM; Carlo FG; Carlo HL; de Lima BA; Dos Passos TA; Lacerda-Santos R Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 25023707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study. Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Hooshmand T; Farazdaghi H; Mehrabi A; Razavi ES Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 24325758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial effect, frictional resistance, and surface roughness of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with nanofilms of silver and titanium oxide: a preliminary study. Ghasemi T; Arash V; Rabiee SM; Rajabnia R; Pourzare A; Rakhshan V Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Jun; 80(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 28181353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biodegradation of orthodontic metallic brackets and associated implications for friction. Regis S; Soares P; Camargo ES; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Maruo H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 21967937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: part I. The passive configuration. Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Ambrose WW; Newman JG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Nov; 114(5):558-72. PubMed ID: 9810052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Debris, roughness and friction of stainless steel archwires following clinical use. Marques IS; Araújo AM; Gurgel JA; Normando D Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 20050747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of sodium bicarbonate air abrasive polishing on attrition and surface micromorphology of ceramic and stainless steel brackets. Parmagnani EA; Basting RT Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 21827231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synergistic effect of wire bending and salivary pH on surface properties and mechanical properties of orthodontic stainless steel archwires. Hobbelink MG; He Y; Xu J; Xie H; Stoll R; Ye Q Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26501207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state. Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical and chemical properties of orthodontic brackets after 12 and 24 months: in situ study. Mendes Bde A; Neto Ferreira RA; Pithon MM; Horta MC; Oliveira DD J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 25025560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires. Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study. Husain N; Kumar A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Pratten DH; Popli K; Germane N; Gunsolley JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Nov; 98(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 2239837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts. Rajakulendran J; Jones S Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations. Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent. Kao CT; Ding SJ; Wang CK; He H; Chou MY; Huang TH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):568.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17110251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination. Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]