These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25024087)

  • 1. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    Charo RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons.
    Meese AJ; Oman NB
    Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exemption from ACA contraception requirement. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2014 WL 2921709, (2014).
    Benefits Q; 2014; 30(3):43. PubMed ID: 25509676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Healthcare Reform: Administrative Rulemaking.
    Berry MD;
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2015 Dec; ():1-44. PubMed ID: 27116775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hobby Lobby ruling may spur shift away from employer coverage.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(27):8. PubMed ID: 25134210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RUNNING MOM AND POP BUSINESSES BY THE GOOD BOOK: THE SCOPE OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF BUSINESS OWNERS.
    Selznick LF
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(4):1353-92. PubMed ID: 27071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional conscience and access to services: can we have both?
    Flynn C; Wilson RF
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 23472813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Religious employers and exceptions to mandated coverage of contraceptives.
    Flicker LS
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 23472812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rules.
    ; ;
    Fed Regist; 2012 Feb; 77(31):8725-30. PubMed ID: 22379684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hobby Lobby's blow to employer-based health insurance.
    Goozner M
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(27):24. PubMed ID: 25134218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Interim final rules.
    ; ;
    Fed Regist; 2014 Aug; 79(166):51092-101. PubMed ID: 25167594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposed regulations could limit access to affordable health coverage for workers' children and family members.
    Jacobs K; Graham-Squire D; Roby DH; Kominski GF; Kinane CM; Needleman J; Watson G; Gans D
    Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res; 2011 Dec; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 23599987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contraceptive Coverage and the Balance Between Conscience and Access.
    Stahl RY; Lynch HF
    JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(22):2179-2180. PubMed ID: 29049513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contraceptive coverage laws: eliminating gender discrimination or infringing on religious liberties?
    Chettiar IM
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):1867-99. PubMed ID: 15164744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act.
    Patton EW; Hall KS; Dalton VK
    Contraception; 2015 Jun; 91(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 25727764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling on health reform.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2012; 41(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 22968770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unraveling Obamacare--can Congress and the Supreme Court undo health care reform?
    Oberlander J
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2445-7. PubMed ID: 25493977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drafting a "sensible" conscience clause: a proposal for meaningful conscience protections for religious employers objecting to the mandated coverage of prescription contraceptives.
    Rudary DJ
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2013; 23(1):353-94. PubMed ID: 23808105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Religious freedom and women's health--the litigation on contraception.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23252500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraceptives and the law: a view from a Catholic medical institution.
    Zimmer EA; Welie JV; Rendell MS
    JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 23677311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.