These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25024133)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of the abdominal test and evaluation systems tool (ABTEST) to accurately measure abdominal force.
    Glenn JM; Galey M; Edwards A; Rickert B; Washington TA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jul; 18(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 25024133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises.
    Escamilla RF; Lewis C; Bell D; Bramblet G; Daffron J; Lambert S; Pecson A; Imamura R; Paulos L; Andrews JR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):265-76. PubMed ID: 20436242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromyographic analysis of upper body, lower body, and abdominal muscles during advanced Swiss ball exercises.
    Marshall PW; Desai I
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1537-45. PubMed ID: 20508456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Electromyographic Activity of the Trunk and Rectus Femoris Muscles During Traditional Crunch and Exercise Using the 5-Minute Shaper Device.
    Silva FHO; Arantes FJ; Gregorio FC; Santos FRA; Fidale TM; Bérzin F; Bigaton DR; Lizardo FB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jan; 34(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31373978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower-limb and trunk muscle activation with back squats and weighted sled apparatus.
    Maddigan ME; Button DC; Behm DG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3346-53. PubMed ID: 25226330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices.
    Snarr RL; Esco MR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Nov; 28(11):3298-305. PubMed ID: 25264667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electromyographic response of global abdominal stabilizers in response to stable- and unstable-base isometric exercise.
    Atkins SJ; Bentley I; Brooks D; Burrows MP; Hurst HT; Sinclair JK
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1609-15. PubMed ID: 26010796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR; Swinton PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Performing Bi- and Unilateral Row Exercises on Core Muscle Activation.
    Saeterbakken A; Andersen V; Brudeseth A; Lund H; Fimland MS
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Nov; 36(11):900-5. PubMed ID: 26134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles during dynamic spine stabilization exercises.
    Souza GM; Baker LL; Powers CM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 82(11):1551-7. PubMed ID: 11689975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electromyographic response of the abdominal musculature to varying abdominal exercises.
    Schoffstall JE; Titcomb DA; Kilbourne BF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3422-6. PubMed ID: 21088553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of trunk curl-up speed on muscular recruitment.
    Vera-Garcia FJ; Flores-Parodi B; Elvira JL; Sarti MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 18438253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromyographic analysis of traditional and nontraditional abdominal exercises: implications for rehabilitation and training.
    Escamilla RF; Babb E; DeWitt R; Jew P; Kelleher P; Burnham T; Busch J; D'Anna K; Mowbray R; Imamura RT
    Phys Ther; 2006 May; 86(5):656-71. PubMed ID: 16649890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating abdominal core muscle fatigue: Assessment of the validity and reliability of the prone bridging test.
    De Blaiser C; De Ridder R; Willems T; Danneels L; Vanden Bossche L; Palmans T; Roosen P
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Feb; 28(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 28544083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Muscle force output and electromyographic activity in squats with various unstable surfaces.
    Saeterbakken AH; Fimland MS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 22450254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis.
    Stark B; Emanuelsson P; Gunnarsson U; Strigård K
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2012 Apr; 46(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 22471258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electromyographic Effect of Using Different Attentional Foci During the Front Plank Exercise.
    Calatayud J; Casaña J; Martín F; Jakobsen MD; Andersen LL; Colado JC
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 98(1):26-29. PubMed ID: 30063527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship Between Muscle Activity and Force During Suspended Bridge Exercises.
    Skibski A; Devorski L; Orfield N; Mangum LC
    J Sport Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 32(5):624-629. PubMed ID: 37146988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of electromyographic and force measures during prone isometric back extension in subjects with and without low back pain.
    Pitcher MJ; Behm DG; MacKinnon SN
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2008 Feb; 33(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromyographic activity of rectus abdominis muscles during dynamic Pilates abdominal exercises.
    Silva GB; Morgan MM; Gomes de Carvalho WR; Silva E; de Freitas WZ; da Silva FF; de Souza RA
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2015 Oct; 19(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 26592220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.