These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25024162)

  • 21. ChIP-Seq data analysis: identification of protein-DNA binding sites with SISSRs peak-finder.
    Narlikar L; Jothi R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 802():305-22. PubMed ID: 22130889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new exhaustive method and strategy for finding motifs in ChIP-enriched regions.
    Jia C; Carson MB; Wang Y; Lin Y; Lu H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86044. PubMed ID: 24475069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peak-Finding Algorithms.
    Hung JH; Weng Z
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2017 Mar; 2017(3):. PubMed ID: 27574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. RSAT::Plants: Motif Discovery in ChIP-Seq Peaks of Plant Genomes.
    Castro-Mondragon JA; Rioualen C; Contreras-Moreira B; van Helden J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1482():297-322. PubMed ID: 27557775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates.
    Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M
    Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ChIP-BIT2: a software tool to detect weak binding events using a Bayesian integration approach.
    Chen X; Shi X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):193. PubMed ID: 33858322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of Myc Chromatin Binding by Calibrated ChIP-Seq Approach.
    Cameron DP; Kuzin V; Baranello L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2318():161-185. PubMed ID: 34019290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Features that define the best ChIP-seq peak calling algorithms.
    Thomas R; Thomas S; Holloway AK; Pollard KS
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 May; 18(3):441-450. PubMed ID: 27169896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Seten: a tool for systematic identification and comparison of processes, phenotypes, and diseases associated with RNA-binding proteins from condition-specific CLIP-seq profiles.
    Budak G; Srivastava R; Janga SC
    RNA; 2017 Jun; 23(6):836-846. PubMed ID: 28336542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SIOMICS: a novel approach for systematic identification of motifs in ChIP-seq data.
    Ding J; Hu H; Li X
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Mar; 42(5):e35. PubMed ID: 24322294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A signal-noise model for significance analysis of ChIP-seq with negative control.
    Xu H; Handoko L; Wei X; Ye C; Sheng J; Wei CL; Lin F; Sung WK
    Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1199-204. PubMed ID: 20371496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SignalSpider: probabilistic pattern discovery on multiple normalized ChIP-Seq signal profiles.
    Wong KC; Li Y; Peng C; Zhang Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 25192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of experimentally verified transcription factor binding sites models for computational analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Levitsky VG; Kulakovskiy IV; Ershov NI; Oshchepkov DY; Makeev VJ; Hodgman TC; Merkulova TI
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 24472686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls.
    Chitpin JG; Awdeh A; Perkins TJ
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3592-3598. PubMed ID: 30824903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the detection and refinement of transcription factor binding sites using ChIP-Seq data.
    Hu M; Yu J; Taylor JM; Chinnaiyan AM; Qin ZS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Apr; 38(7):2154-67. PubMed ID: 20056654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crunch: integrated processing and modeling of ChIP-seq data in terms of regulatory motifs.
    Berger S; Pachkov M; Arnold P; Omidi S; Kelley N; Salatino S; van Nimwegen E
    Genome Res; 2019 Jul; 29(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 31138617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. GeF-seq: A Simple Procedure for Base Pair Resolution ChIP-seq.
    Chumsakul O; Nakamura K; Ishikawa S; Oshima T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1837():33-47. PubMed ID: 30109604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.