These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25024162)

  • 41. AIControl: replacing matched control experiments with machine learning improves ChIP-seq peak identification.
    Hiranuma N; Lundberg SM; Lee SI
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e58. PubMed ID: 30869146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A signal processing approach for enriched region detection in RNA polymerase II ChIP-seq data.
    Han Z; Tian L; Pécot T; Huang T; Machiraju R; Huang K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. PubMed ID: 22536865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A generalized linear model for peak calling in ChIP-Seq data.
    Xu J; Zhang Y
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):826-38. PubMed ID: 22533622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
    Machanick P; Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Motif oriented high-resolution analysis of ChIP-seq data reveals the topological order of CTCF and cohesin proteins on DNA.
    Nagy G; Czipa E; Steiner L; Nagy T; Pongor S; Nagy L; Barta E
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):637. PubMed ID: 27526722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MACE: model based analysis of ChIP-exo.
    Wang L; Chen J; Wang C; Uusküla-Reimand L; Chen K; Medina-Rivera A; Young EJ; Zimmermann MT; Yan H; Sun Z; Zhang Y; Wu ST; Huang H; Wilson MD; Kocher JP; Li W
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Nov; 42(20):e156. PubMed ID: 25249628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data.
    Zang C; Schones DE; Zeng C; Cui K; Zhao K; Peng W
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(15):1952-8. PubMed ID: 19505939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ChExMix: A Method for Identifying and Classifying Protein-DNA Interaction Subtypes.
    Yamada N; Kuntala PK; Pugh BF; Mahony S
    J Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):429-435. PubMed ID: 32023130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. BayesPeak: Bayesian analysis of ChIP-seq data.
    Spyrou C; Stark R; Lynch AG; Tavaré S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 10():299. PubMed ID: 19772557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genome Wide Approaches to Identify Protein-DNA Interactions.
    Ma T; Ye Z; Wang L
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7641-7654. PubMed ID: 29848263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Practical guidelines for the comprehensive analysis of ChIP-seq data.
    Bailey T; Krajewski P; Ladunga I; Lefebvre C; Li Q; Liu T; Madrigal P; Taslim C; Zhang J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(11):e1003326. PubMed ID: 24244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
    Nix DA; Courdy SJ; Boucher KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():523. PubMed ID: 19061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accounting for GC-content bias reduces systematic errors and batch effects in ChIP-seq data.
    Teng M; Irizarry RA
    Genome Res; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 29025895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ChIP-PaM: an algorithm to identify protein-DNA interaction using ChIP-Seq data.
    Wu S; Wang J; Zhao W; Pounds S; Cheng C
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2010 Jun; 7():18. PubMed ID: 20525272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Computational analysis of ChIP-seq data.
    Ji H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 674():143-59. PubMed ID: 20827590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
    Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
    DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification of Enriched Regions in ChIP-Seq Data via a Linear-Time Multi-Level Thresholding Algorithm.
    Naik M; Rueda L; Vasighizaker A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(5):2842-2850. PubMed ID: 34398762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An algorithmic perspective of de novo cis-regulatory motif finding based on ChIP-seq data.
    Liu B; Yang J; Li Y; McDermaid A; Ma Q
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):1069-1081. PubMed ID: 28334268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.