These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25024239)

  • 1. Effect of payment incentives on cancer screening in Ontario primary care.
    Kiran T; Wilton AS; Moineddin R; Paszat L; Glazier RH
    Ann Fam Med; 2014 Jul; 12(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 25024239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-centered medical home implementation and use of preventive services: the role of practice socioeconomic context.
    Markovitz AR; Alexander JA; Lantz PM; Paustian ML
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):598-606. PubMed ID: 25686468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.
    Kaczorowski J; Hearps SJ; Lohfeld L; Goeree R; Donald F; Burgess K; Sebaldt RJ
    Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):e282-9. PubMed ID: 23766067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review.
    Mauro M; Rotundo G; Giancotti M
    Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 123(12):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 31587819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
    Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Financial Incentives and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation in Ontario's Primary Care Practice Models.
    Pendrith C; Thind A; Zaric GS; Sarma S
    Healthc Policy; 2016 Aug; 12(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 27585031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increase in the pharmacological management of Type 2 diabetes with pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.
    Gallagher N; Cardwell C; Hughes C; O'Reilly D
    Diabet Med; 2015 Jan; 32(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 25185888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework?
    Pandya A; Soeteman DI; Gupta A; Kamel H; Mushlin AI; Rosenthal MB
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e006492. PubMed ID: 32615799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction.
    Hadley J; Mitchell JM; Sulmasy DP; Bloche MG
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Apr; 34(1 Pt 2):307-21. PubMed ID: 10199677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada.
    Lofters AK; Mark A; Taljaard M; Green ME; Glazier RH; Dahrouge S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(1):147. PubMed ID: 30157772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Take the money and run? Redemption of a gift card incentive in a clinician survey.
    Chen JS; Sprague BL; Klabunde CN; Tosteson AN; Bitton A; Onega T; MacLean CD; Harris K; Schapira MM; Haas JS;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():25. PubMed ID: 26911445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences.
    McDonald R; Roland M
    Ann Fam Med; 2009; 7(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 19273866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Grunfeld E; Manca D; Moineddin R; Thorpe KE; Hoch JS; Campbell-Scherer D; Meaney C; Rogers J; Beca J; Krueger P; Mamdani M;
    BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Nov; 14():175. PubMed ID: 24252125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators.
    Lester H; Schmittdiel J; Selby J; Fireman B; Campbell S; Lee J; Whippy A; Madvig P
    BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c1898. PubMed ID: 20460330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliance with quality prescribing indicators linked to financial incentives: what about not incentivized indicators?: an observational study.
    Fernández Urrusuno R; Pérez Pérez P; Montero Balosa MC; Márquez Calzada C; Pascual de la Pisa B
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 70(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24297343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer screening rates among transgender adults: Cross-sectional analysis of primary care data.
    Kiran T; Davie S; Singh D; Hranilovic S; Pinto AD; Abramovich A; Lofters A
    Can Fam Physician; 2019 Jan; 65(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 30674526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hope for decreasing socioeconomic disparities.
    Katz MH
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):607. PubMed ID: 25685914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care.
    Wee CC; Phillips RS; Burstin HR; Cook EF; Puopolo AL; Brennan TA; Haas JS
    Am J Med; 2001 Feb; 110(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 11182103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family doctor responses to changes in incentives for influenza immunization under the U.K. Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme.
    Kontopantelis E; Doran T; Gravelle H; Goudie R; Siciliani L; Sutton M
    Health Serv Res; 2012 Jun; 47(3 Pt 1):1117-36. PubMed ID: 22171997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care.
    Gavagan TF; Du H; Saver BG; Adams GJ; Graham DM; McCray R; Goodrick GK
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2010; 23(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 20823357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.