These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25025127)

  • 1. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
    Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
    Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment on "Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios".
    Gilbert AQ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):14053-4. PubMed ID: 25405812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comment on "Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios".
    Power TM; Power DS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):14049-50. PubMed ID: 25405723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to comment on "Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios".
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):14055-6. PubMed ID: 25405586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to comment on “Environmental implications of united states coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios”.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):14051-2. PubMed ID: 25405493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
    Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Country-Level Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquefied Natural Gas Trade for Electricity Generation.
    Kasumu AS; Li V; Coleman JW; Liendo J; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 29328654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impacts of the Minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia.
    Giang A; Stokes LC; Streets DG; Corbitt ES; Selin NE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5326-35. PubMed ID: 25851589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia.
    Koplitz SN; Jacob DJ; Sulprizio MP; Myllyvirta L; Reid C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1467-1476. PubMed ID: 28080047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greenhouse Gas Estimates of LNG Exports Must Include Global Market Effects.
    Smillie S; Muller N; Griffin WM; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(2):1194-1201. PubMed ID: 34986310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Residential Solar PV Systems in the Carolinas: Opportunities and Outcomes.
    Alqahtani BJ; Holt KM; Patiño-Echeverri D; Pratson L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2082-91. PubMed ID: 26745347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.