These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25025535)

  • 1. Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Çelik M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1752-4. PubMed ID: 25025535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiologic Evidence of Cochlear Implant Bone Bed Formation Following the Subperiosteal Temporal Pocket Technique.
    Turanoglu AK; Yigit O; Acioglu E; Okbay AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Apr; 154(4):702-6. PubMed ID: 26884370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Conventional Technique with Suture Fixation and Subperiosteal Tight Pocket Technique on Revision Cochlear Implantation Rate.
    Ceylan ME; Zorlu ME; Çorakçı O; Akı ES; Yıldırım GA; Dalgıç A
    J Int Adv Otol; 2024 Jul; 20(4):301-305. PubMed ID: 39159055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Orhan KS; Yiğit O; Başaran B; Polat B; Güneş S; Acoğlu E; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 21725262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Güldiken Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):916-8. PubMed ID: 26314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear Implant Receiver-Stimulator Migration Using the Subperiosteal Pocket Technique: Objective Measurements of Early and Late Positioning.
    Maxwell AK; Cass SP
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30742594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spontaneous bone bed formation in pediatric cochlear implantation is associated with duration of implantation.
    Diab K; Pashchinina O; Kondratchikov D; Panina O; Balakina L; Korobkin A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Nov; 150():110897. PubMed ID: 34488040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children.
    Cohen MS; Ha AY; Kitsko DJ; Chi DH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Sep; 78(9):1545-7. PubMed ID: 25064628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simplified fixation of the new thin cochlear implant receiver-stimulators in children: long term results with the "back-pocket" technique.
    Cuda D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1158-61. PubMed ID: 23707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision cochlear implantation following internal auditory canal insertion.
    Heman-Ackah SE; Friedmann DR; Cosetti MK; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Dec; 123(12):3141-7. PubMed ID: 24114888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Cochlear Implant "Seatbelt" Technique for Receiver/Stimulator Fixation.
    Elms HL; Del Risco A; Dukes PV; Reed WT; Cunningham CD
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jul; 134(7):3374-3376. PubMed ID: 38280101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of CIR-S using the subperiosteal pocket technique under 2 years of age.
    Cetinkaya EA; Yildiz M; Ensari N; Gokalp Isik U; Yılmaz GO; Aydenizoz D; Selcuk OT; Eyigor H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 34852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal bone histopathology in revision cochlear implantation.
    Smith AF; Ishiyama G; Lopez IA; Ishiyama A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 38127671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
    Markodimitraki LM; Harkel TCT; Bennink E; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):605. PubMed ID: 37743463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision cochlear implantation.
    Roland JT; Huang TC; Cohen NL
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 39(4):833-9, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 16895788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and revision of a displaced cochlear implant electrode in the internal auditory canal.
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Ernst A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 23510683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.