240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25026097)
1. The influence of context on recognition memory in monkeys: effects of hippocampal, parahippocampal and perirhinal lesions.
Bachevalier J; Nemanic S; Alvarado MC
Behav Brain Res; 2015 May; 285():89-98. PubMed ID: 25026097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Memory for spatial location and object-place associations are differently processed by the hippocampal formation, parahippocampal areas TH/TF and perirhinal cortex.
Bachevalier J; Nemanic S
Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 17924520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys.
Nemanic S; Alvarado MC; Bachevalier J
J Neurosci; 2004 Feb; 24(8):2013-26. PubMed ID: 14985444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of object recognition memory in rhesus macaques with neonatal lesions of the perirhinal cortex.
Zeamer A; Richardson RL; Weiss AR; Bachevalier J
Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 11():31-41. PubMed ID: 25096364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change in background context disrupts performance on visual paired comparison following hippocampal damage.
Pascalis O; Hunkin NM; Bachevalier J; Mayes AR
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2107-13. PubMed ID: 19467361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of memory for spatial locations and object/place associations in infant rhesus macaques with and without neonatal hippocampal lesions.
Blue SN; Kazama AM; Bachevalier J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2013 Nov; 19(10):1053-64. PubMed ID: 23880255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental trajectory of object recognition memory in infant rhesus macaques with and without neonatal hippocampal lesions.
Zeamer A; Heuer E; Bachevalier J
J Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 30(27):9157-65. PubMed ID: 20610749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans.
Pihlajamäki M; Tanila H; Könönen M; Hänninen T; Hämäläinen A; Soininen H; Aronen HJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(7):1939-49. PubMed ID: 15078568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception and conception: temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects.
Barense MD; Henson RN; Graham KS
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3052-67. PubMed ID: 21391761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping parahippocampal systems for recognition and recency memory in the absence of the rat hippocampus.
Kinnavane L; Amin E; Horne M; Aggleton JP
Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 40(12):3720-34. PubMed ID: 25264133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociable memory traces within the macaque medial temporal lobe predict subsequent recognition performance.
Miyamoto K; Adachi Y; Osada T; Watanabe T; Kimura HM; Setsuie R; Miyashita Y
J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(5):1988-97. PubMed ID: 24478378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint.
Barense MD; Henson RN; Lee AC; Graham KS
Hippocampus; 2010 Mar; 20(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 19499575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of selective neonatal hippocampal lesions on tests of object and spatial recognition memory in monkeys.
Heuer E; Bachevalier J
Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 21341885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus similarity and encoding time influence incidental recognition memory in adult monkeys with selective hippocampal lesions.
Zeamer A; Meunier M; Bachevalier J
Learn Mem; 2011; 18(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 21357439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty.
Howard LR; Kumaran D; Ólafsdóttir HF; Spiers HJ
J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5253-61. PubMed ID: 21471360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No effect of hippocampal lesions on perirhinal cortex-dependent feature-ambiguous visual discriminations.
Saksida LM; Bussey TJ; Buckmaster CA; Murray EA
Hippocampus; 2006; 16(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 16463387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medial temporal lobe contributions to cued retrieval of items and contexts.
Hannula DE; Libby LA; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Oct; 51(12):2322-32. PubMed ID: 23466350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey.
Beason-Held LL; Rosene DL; Killiany RJ; Moss MB
Hippocampus; 1999; 9(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 10560927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
