These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25026311)

  • 1. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
    Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
    Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.
    Chae S; Lee A; Lee JH
    Gastric Cancer; 2011 Jun; 14(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 21360132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
    Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
    Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China.
    Deng J; Liang H; Sun D; Wang D; Pan Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20217252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
    Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the survival difference between AJCC 6th and 7th editions for gastric cancer patients.
    Fang WL; Huang KH; Chen JH; Lo SS; Hsieh MC; Shen KH; Li AF; Niu DM; Chiou SH; Wu CW
    World J Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(12):2723-9. PubMed ID: 21918892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognosis of 980 patients with gastric cancer after surgical resection.
    Wang W; Li YF; Sun XW; Chen YB; Li W; Xu DZ; Guan XX; Huang CY; Zhan YQ; Zhou ZW
    Chin J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 29(11):923-30. PubMed ID: 20979691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified subclassification to evaluate the survival of patients with N3 gastric cancer: an international database study.
    Lin MQ; Wang JB; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Lin JX; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; He QL; Huang CM
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 30616588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
    Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor volume as a prognostic factor was superior to the seventh edition of the pT classification in resectable gastric cancer.
    Jiang N; Deng JY; Ding XW; Liu Y; Liang H
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 25601610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the 8th UICC staging system for esophageal and gastric cancers in Siewert type II junctional adenocarcinomas.
    Karstens KF; Ghadban T; Sawez S; Konczalla L; Woestemeier A; Bachmann K; Uzunoglu FG; Tachezy M; Vettorazzi E; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):638-643. PubMed ID: 31879051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staging for Remnant Gastric Cancer: The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio vs. the UICC 7th Edition System.
    Nakagawa M; Choi YY; An JY; Hong JH; Kim JW; Kim HI; Cheong JH; Hyung WJ; Choi SH; Noh SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4322-4331. PubMed ID: 27370654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
    Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.
    Yeh CN; Wang SY; Hsu JT; Chiang KC; Cheng CT; Tsai CY; Liu YY; Liao CH; Liu KH; Yeh TS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(8):e575. PubMed ID: 25715257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer.
    Talsma K; van Hagen P; Grotenhuis BA; Steyerberg EW; Tilanus HW; van Lanschot JJ; Wijnhoven BP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2142-8. PubMed ID: 22395974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.