These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25026589)

  • 21. Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor in which granular sludge and dynamic filtration are integrated.
    Yang J; Ji X; Lu L; Ma H; Chen Y; Guo J; Fang F
    Biofouling; 2017 Jan; 33(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 27911097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Treatment of wastewater containing phenol using a tubular ceramic membrane bioreactor.
    Ersu CB; Ong SK
    Environ Technol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 18613621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: influence of wastewater salinity variation.
    Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Mannina G; Torregrossa M; Viviani G
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 162():60-9. PubMed ID: 24747383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review.
    Jegatheesan V; Pramanik BK; Chen J; Navaratna D; Chang CY; Shu L
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Mar; 204():202-212. PubMed ID: 26776150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition for municipal secondary effluent treatment.
    Lin H; Wang F; Ding L; Hong H; Chen J; Lu X
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21794980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of chemical coagulants to control fouling potential for wastewater membrane bioreactor processes.
    Fan F; Zhou H; Husain H
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Sep; 79(9):952-7. PubMed ID: 17910362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nitrification performance in a membrane bioreactor treating industrial wastewater.
    Dvořák L; Svojitka J; Wanner J; Wintgens T
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4412-21. PubMed ID: 23764592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment of cosmetic wastewater by a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR).
    Monsalvo VM; Lopez J; Mohedano AF; Rodriguez JJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Nov; 21(22):12662-70. PubMed ID: 24958535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A combined upflow anaerobic sludge bed and trickling biofilter process for the treatment of swine wastewater.
    Zhao B; Li J; Buelna G; Dubé R; Le Bihan Y
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(10):1265-75. PubMed ID: 26588487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-stage biofilm-MBR for nitrogen removal and enhanced membrane performance.
    Sun C; Leiknes T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 22744690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors.
    Ersahin ME; Ozgun H; Tao Y; van Lier JB
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():420-9. PubMed ID: 24156951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of meteorological conditions on the water quality of wastewater treatment systems: a comparative study of phytoremediation and membrane bioreactor system.
    Andleeb KB; Hashmi I
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 2017(3):718-728. PubMed ID: 30016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Compact wastewater treatment process based on abiotic nitrogen management achieved high-rate and facile pollutants removal.
    Wang K; Zhou Z; Yu S; Qiang J; Yuan Y; Qin Y; Xiao K; Zhao X; Wu Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Jun; 330():124991. PubMed ID: 33743281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of MBR and activated sludge in the treatment of paper mill wastewater.
    Lerner M; Stahl N; Galil NI
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):23-9. PubMed ID: 17486831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microbiological and physicochemical evaluation of the effluent quality in a membrane bioreactor system to meet the legislative limits for wastewater reuse.
    Azis K; Vardalachakis C; Ntougias S; Melidis P
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 76(7-8):1796-1804. PubMed ID: 28991794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance evaluation of a novel reciprocation membrane bioreactor (rMBR) for enhanced nutrient removal in wastewater treatment: a comparative study.
    Ho J; Smith S; Kim GD; Roh HK
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(6):917-27. PubMed ID: 26360751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
    Nywening JP; Zhou H
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of long-term ceramic membrane bioreactors without and with in-situ ozonation in wastewater treatment: Membrane fouling, effluent quality and microbial community.
    Tang S; Li J; Zhang Z; Ren B; Zhang X
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():788-799. PubMed ID: 30380486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.