BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25026889)

  • 21. A population-based observational study comparing Cervista and Hybrid Capture 2 methods: improved relative specificity of the Cervista assay by increasing its cut-off.
    Boehmer G; Wang L; Iftner A; Holz B; Haedicke J; von Wasielewski R; Martus P; Iftner T
    BMC Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 14():674. PubMed ID: 25487281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56-60.
    Lamin H; Eklund C; Elfström KM; Carlsten-Thor A; Hortlund M; Elfgren K; Törnberg S; Dillner J
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014788. PubMed ID: 28566363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-year risk of high-grade CIN for women aged 30 years or older who undergo baseline Pap cytology and HPV co-screening.
    Guo M; Khanna A; Wang J; Dawlett MA; Kologinczak TL; Lyons GR; Bassett RL; Sneige N; Gong Y; Bevers TB
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):644-651. PubMed ID: 28498639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
    Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.
    Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):273. PubMed ID: 29523108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Impact of Triage for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance with Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.
    Fujiwara H; Suzuki M; Morisawa H; Sayama M; Kimura K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 20(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30678384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-sampling to improve cervical cancer screening coverage in Switzerland: a randomised controlled trial.
    Viviano M; Catarino R; Jeannot E; Boulvain M; Malinverno MU; Vassilakos P; Petignat P
    Br J Cancer; 2017 May; 116(11):1382-1388. PubMed ID: 28427086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of HPV DNA testing with hybrid capture 2 in triaging women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand.
    Khunamornpong S; Settakorn J; Sukpan K; Srisomboon J; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10961-6. PubMed ID: 25605209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
    Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Nov; 16(1):835. PubMed ID: 27809810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
    Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
    Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amplification of specific chromosomal regions assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization on Pap smears to be added as screening tool for identifying women at risk of progressing to cervical cancer.
    Upendram P; Sahni S; Mohiuddin K; Poornima S; Gourishankar B; Kumar Vattam K; Boddala P; Jayashankar E; Mohiuddin S; Kamineni V; Mohan V; Houldsworth J; Hasan Q
    Tumour Biol; 2017 Oct; 39(10):1010428317698363. PubMed ID: 28990460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CITRUS, cervical cancer screening trial by randomization of HPV testing intervention for upcoming screening: Design, methods and baseline data of 18,471 women.
    Morisada T; Teramoto K; Takano H; Sakamoto I; Nishio H; Iwata T; Hashi A; Katoh R; Okamoto A; Sasaki H; Nakatani E; Teramukai S; Aoki D
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 50(Pt A):60-67. PubMed ID: 28818742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.
    Brewer N; Bartholomew K; Maxwell A; Grant J; McPherson G; Wihongi H; Bromhead C; Scott N; Crengle S; Cunningham C; Douwes J; Potter JD
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1198. PubMed ID: 31815615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity of high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture II (hrHPV HC2) test using SurePath(TM) specimens in the prediction of cervical high-grade squamous lesions.
    Zhou F; Pulinthanathu R; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Simsir A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 May; 43(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 25546355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
    Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology.
    Zehbe I; Jackson R; Wood B; Weaver B; Escott N; Severini A; Krajden M; Bishop L; Morrisseau K; Ogilvie G; Burchell AN; Little J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011754. PubMed ID: 27855089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory.
    Ashman D; Zhang H; Li J; Austin M; Wang T; Pradhan D; Zhao C
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):550-555. PubMed ID: 32475726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.