181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25027081)
1. Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.
Prasad TV; Thulkar S; Hari S; Sharma DN; Kumar S
Indian J Med Res; 2014 May; 139(5):714-9. PubMed ID: 25027081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting the role of computerized tomographic scan and cystoscopy for detecting bladder invasion in the revised FIGO staging system for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Sharma DN; Thulkar S; Goyal S; Shukla NK; Kumar S; Rath GK; Julka PK; Saini G; Bahl A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 20375799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changing trend in the patterns of pretreatment diagnostic assessment for patients with cervical cancer in Japan.
Tomita N; Toita T; Kodaira T; Shinoda A; Uno T; Numasaki H; Teshima T; Mitsumori M
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):577-80. PubMed ID: 21945554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HIV status does not have an impact on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) findings or radiotherapy treatment recommendations in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Simonds H; Botha MH; Ellmann A; Warwick J; Doruyter A; Neugut AI; Van Der Merwe H; Jacobson JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Oct; 29(8):1252-1257. PubMed ID: 31413068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of CT Scan in Detecting Bladder Involvement Among Patients With Cervical Carcinoma.
Agrawal R; Agarwal R
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53670. PubMed ID: 38455819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.
Dhamija E; Baby A; Bhatla N; Pulappadi VP; Kumar M; Kumar S; Kumar L; Sharma D
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 35295016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective study of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes positivity in stage 1A to 2A cervical cancer patients.
John Lim BB; Yong CM
Med J Malaysia; 2021 Jul; 76(4):534-540. PubMed ID: 34305115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.
Sahdev A; Sohaib SA; Wenaden AE; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 17309561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical Cancer Staging in Saudi Arabia Clinicoradiological Correlation.
Anfinan N
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8745828. PubMed ID: 31341909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complementary Prognostic Value of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Whole-Body Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Sala E; Micco M; Burger IA; Yakar D; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1461-7. PubMed ID: 26397068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
