BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25027797)

  • 1. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil.
    Berndt A; Tomkins NW
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():363-72. PubMed ID: 23739477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy.
    Lobato JF; Freitas AK; Devincenzi T; Cardoso LL; Tarouco JU; Vieira RM; Dillenburg DR; Castro I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 25017318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems.
    DeRamus HA; Clement TC; Giampola DD; Dickison PC
    J Environ Qual; 2003; 32(1):269-77. PubMed ID: 12549566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay.
    Picasso VD; Modernel PD; Becoña G; Salvo L; Gutiérrez L; Astigarraga L
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 25048094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pasture intensification in beef cattle production can affect methane emission intensity.
    Sakamoto LS; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Lemes AP; Azenha MV; Alves TC; Rodrigues PHM; Corte RR; Leme PR; Oliveira PPA
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 98(10):. PubMed ID: 32930330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grazing intensity affects the environmental impact of dairy systems.
    Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Larson R
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6804-6821. PubMed ID: 28601442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growth, carcass traits and palatability: can the influence of the feeding regimes explain the variability found on those attributes in different Uruguayan genotypes?
    Brito G; San Julián R; La Manna A; Del Campo M; Montossi F; Banchero G; Chalkling D; Soares de Lima JM
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 25048096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
    Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Net protein contribution and enteric methane production of pasture and grain-finished beef cattle supply chains.
    Thomas DT; Beletse YG; Dominik S; Lehnert SA
    Animal; 2021 Dec; 15(12):100392. PubMed ID: 34844185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensive sheep and beef production from pasture--a New Zealand perspective of concerns, opportunities and challenges.
    Morris ST; Kenyon PR
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 24998778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock.
    Gill M; Smith P; Wilkinson JM
    Animal; 2010 Mar; 4(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 22443938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.
    Tedeschi LO; Beauchemin KA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36645233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options.
    Hristov AN; Ott T; Tricarico J; Rotz A; Waghorn G; Adesogan A; Dijkstra J; Montes F; Oh J; Kebreab E; Oosting SJ; Gerber PJ; Henderson B; Makkar HP; Firkins JL
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5095-113. PubMed ID: 24045470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Animal board invited review: Specialising and intensifying cattle production for better efficiency and less global warming: contrasting results for milk and meat co-production at different scales.
    Faverdin P; Guyomard H; Puillet L; Forslund A
    Animal; 2022 Jan; 16(1):100431. PubMed ID: 34996025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies to reduce methane emissions from farmed ruminants grazing on pasture.
    Buddle BM; Denis M; Attwood GT; Altermann E; Janssen PH; Ronimus RS; Pinares-Patiño CS; Muetzel S; Neil Wedlock D
    Vet J; 2011 Apr; 188(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 20347354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
    Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
    Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
    Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forage use to improve environmental sustainability of ruminant production.
    Guyader J; Janzen HH; Kroebel R; Beauchemin KA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3147-3158. PubMed ID: 27695772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.