389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25028687)
1. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S
Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides.
Jones PE
Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a Template-Guided Implant Surgery System with a CAD/CAM-Based Measurement Method: An In Vitro Study.
Brandt J; Brenner M; Lauer HC; Brandt S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29534120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single appointment protocol to create a partially edentulous CAD/CAM guided surgical template: a clinical report.
Marchack CB; Charles A; Pettersson A
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 22133389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
